Jump to content

Talk:Chase Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Chasebank.jpg

[edit]

Image:Chasebank.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chasebank.jpg

[edit]

Image:Chasebank.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

[edit]

This article seems to be trying to do two things at the same time:

  1. represent Chase Manhattan, prior to JPMorgan Chase
  2. represent Chase, the current retail banking division of JPMorgan Chase

Because Chase, the current bank, shares the same history as Chase Manhattan, but the name "Chase Manhattan" is no longer in use, I'm going to rename the article Chase (bank).
--JKeene 22:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addidas Ocampo anderson Ma Mocampoanderson (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Can anyone explain why it says: the Texas Company and does not elaborate on that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.86.211.241 (talk) 02:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because the article was vandalized on 6 February 2020 and no one caught it.
The main problem is that there are several poorly educated editors wreaking havoc on the Manual of Style who have proceeded to alienate most WP editors, including myself. This is why vandals are running amok on the English Wikipedia and the project is literally falling apart. Until the Wikimedia Foundation comes to its senses and starts summarily imposing permanent bans which should have been done a long time ago, Wikipedia is probably going to be a mess for a while. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image Image:Manufacturers Hanover logo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Manhattan logo not in article

[edit]

Before the Chase logo have stripes in the octagon much like the IBM logo consists of stripes. Put in article? Copyright problems? Chergles (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV issue with Zapatista section

[edit]

This section, as originally drafted, diverged from the NPOV standard. I have endeavored to report the facts without the earlier POV angle. Nandt1 (talk) 03:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know why, or who made it this way, but the whole thing reads like PR piece, not an article. CMB has been involved in varied controversies over the decades sufficient to fill volumes, but none are mentioned here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.68.134 (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Footprint

[edit]

Is there any way we can get a geographical footprint of Chase on here? The other three of the Big Four banks have footprint maps, plus several "super-regional" banks. 141.151.183.232 (talk) 02:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chase organization date

[edit]

Please resolve the issue of how a bank organized in1799 could have been named after a man (Salmon Chase) who was born in 1806. This does not make sense on its face and some explanation is owed to the reader. Are you using the 1799 date provided by Chase bank without verification? The information you provide on this website should not support such conflicts.

Use whatever source you think is appropriate to verify the facts, but since Salmon Chase ran for president in1860 and was a Supreme court justice later than that, it is empirically obvious that Chase bank could not have been named after him in1799. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cynmichaud (talk • contribs) 19:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chase will begin refusing certain cash deposits

[edit]

Chase Bank has announced that starting on March 3, 2014, only customers with Chase checking and saving accounts will be able to put cash into other customers' accounts. All others will use check, money order, etc. Reasons given were "fear of money laundering" and "sometimes customers ask us who a deposit is from". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 01:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As of June 6, 2014, the latest Chase rule now says a person's name must be on the account if that person wants to deposit cash. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 20:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chase freezing accounts of porn actors ?

[edit]

"Layton Benton, the 22-year-old star of movies such as 'The Bomb Booty', said today that her account containing thousands of dollars was closed on April 11 and she only found out when her ATM card was declined. Chase reportedly told her she was a 'risk'"

Accounts of several porn industry workers closed following a 'review' claims bank letters but give no other explanation Speculation that it is part of an effort by the Department of Justice investigation called 'Operation Choke Point' Department have been approaching banks asking them to deny access to people 'who may be breaking the law' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2616852/Porn-star-suing-Chase-bank-account-closed.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 18:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, OK, its already there. Benton is not mentioned though, check out the "Targeted account closures" section. The "Operation choke Point" thing is something new. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Chase (bank) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.change.org/petitions/chase-paymentech-process-credit-cards-for-online-condom-purchases-and-end-the-stigma-against-condoms
    Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 June 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. The one opposer presented a good, valid argument; however, this proposal was carried by supporters. (closed by a page mover)  What's in your palette? Paine  08:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chase (bank) → Chase Bank – Per WP:NATURAL, which states Natural disambiguation: Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title. Do not, however, use obscure or made-up names — the official website of Chase uses "Chase Bank" as well. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 00:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. — Music1201 talk 04:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the name of the bank is JP Morgan Chase Bank, not Chase Bank or JPMorgan Chase. I'm fine with Chase Bank, per WP:NATURAL, but AjaxSmack has a point. RGloucester — ☎ 21:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am open to using JP Morgan Chase Bank as a viable option. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 22:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, really Coolcaesar? I guess I am very ignorant today. The official Chase website uses Chase Bank. ;) ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 14:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I said "in prose." Read their Web site carefully. They only use "Chase Bank" in Web page titles, in metasearch tags in headers, in a navigation link in a footer ("See More Chase Bank Solutions"), and as part of the full legal name of their two operating national bank entities ("JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A." and "Chase Bank USA, N.A."). If you examine their Web page design carefully, they consistently avoid using "Chase Bank" in the body of Web pages themselves.
The most likely reason for this inconsistency with the page navigation is that whomever writes copy for their Web pages is working from some kind of internal style guide or is subject to review by an internal editor who is ensuring that the Chase brand is always referred to in copy as just Chase, while the page navigation is probably coming from a separate Web design department or outside consultant and there may not be enough marketing people in the right places to enforce consistent name usage. This is a major problem in most organizations which drives marketing people crazy. Very few marketing people actually reach C-level positions, and most people who come up to that level through operations or finance don't have sufficient marketing training, so marketing people are always having problems persuading other departments not under their direct control to follow brand usage guidelines. Only a few large corporations with really powerful brands like Disney have been successful with enforcing strict brand management. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chase Bank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

conflicting branch numbers

[edit]

the numbers in the infobox and the first sentence of the second paragraph show two different numbers for the amount of branches JPmorgan chase has. Mindustry0 (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Chase Bank glitch

[edit]

Any update on the 2024 Chase Bank glitch? Did the people get punished, or did they get away with it? Benjamin (talk) 04:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, seems like they got away with it, criminally at least. Benjamin (talk) 01:19, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chase_Bank&oldid=1294490288"