Talk:Cathedral (short story)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Open to Interpretation as currently worded
[edit]The current plot, motif, and theme sections are all open to interpretation. The summary section is also more of a response than a summary.130.101.162.84 (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit Request
[edit]EDIT REQUEST: I suggest we remove the sentence: 'With its publication Carver finally received the critical praise he had longed for.' Carver received much critical acclaim before Cathedral, and this suggests a dependence on critical acclaim that is reductive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chronotopian (talk • contribs) 12:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Why the rating was changed from Low to Mid on "Importance scale"
[edit]This short story by Carver is one of his most famous, if not his most famous. It is certainly one of his most well-known stories. It's also the title story of last major collection. Arguably could be given a High rating, but does not have the notability outside literature classes in the way "Lolita" or "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" does. Or if we stay with short stories, it may not have the notability of "The Most Dangerous Game" or "A Clean, Well-Lighted Place" (for example).
Wiki Education assignment: English 111 The Short Story
[edit] This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2025 and 30 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maisadumadi33 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Bpeters03, Jagindel.
— Assignment last updated by Matthew17718 (talk) 03:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)