This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
@MarioSoulTruthFan: Is there anyway a reader of the article could be confused with another type of tunnel (which are fairly rare), especially when the description mentions a "manhole" in context? Seems excessive. Leitmotiv (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is quite differente as its just a summary of the video and there is o indication of what type of tunnel. Now if I say it is a "utility tunnel" like I did in the video, then I have to establish if it is under or above ground. The MTV source says "subterranean tunnels". MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The term videography has a very specific definition in published literature on film/video. Videography is the work done by a videographer as opposed to cinematography which is the work done by a cinematographer. A videography does not mean a list of film/video/media credits. There are no sources using the term in this way outside wikipedia. Whoever started using the word this way on wikipedia created an original neologism which is something we cannot do per WP:NEO and WP:VERIFIABILITY. I am surprised that this was not caught or brought up when this was a featured list candidate. As such, the article title is fundamentally inaccurate and misrepresents the article's content. Hopefully this will get solved quickly to avoid the need for an WP:FAR.4meter4 (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And yet, we are solving it. Most of the "videography" titled articles have already been retitled, and the cats are being renamed as well through CFD. There are only a handful of articles left to hash out (less than 10).4meter4 (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]