Jump to content

Talk:Bruno Mars videography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listBruno Mars videography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starBruno Mars videography is part of the Bruno Mars series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on July 31, 2020.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 14, 2020Featured list candidatePromoted
June 16, 2024Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Underground Tunnel

[edit]

@MarioSoulTruthFan: Is there anyway a reader of the article could be confused with another type of tunnel (which are fairly rare), especially when the description mentions a "manhole" in context? Seems excessive. Leitmotiv (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't wrote that description, by the way "manhole" awful word. Yes, this kind of tunnel 1. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is quite differente as its just a summary of the video and there is o indication of what type of tunnel. Now if I say it is a "utility tunnel" like I did in the video, then I have to establish if it is under or above ground. The MTV source says "subterranean tunnels". MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Title change needed

[edit]

The term videography has a very specific definition in published literature on film/video. Videography is the work done by a videographer as opposed to cinematography which is the work done by a cinematographer. A videography does not mean a list of film/video/media credits. There are no sources using the term in this way outside wikipedia. Whoever started using the word this way on wikipedia created an original neologism which is something we cannot do per WP:NEO and WP:VERIFIABILITY. I am surprised that this was not caught or brought up when this was a featured list candidate. As such, the article title is fundamentally inaccurate and misrepresents the article's content. Hopefully this will get solved quickly to avoid the need for an WP:FAR.4meter4 (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are several articles on wikipedia like this Posting on this talk page won't solve it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And yet, we are solving it. Most of the "videography" titled articles have already been retitled, and the cats are being renamed as well through CFD. There are only a handful of articles left to hash out (less than 10).4meter4 (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you post the CFD? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Madonna videography which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]