Talk:Bicycle law in California

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

withdrawn, 1 November 2012, see discussion.
no consensus, 1 June 2009, see discussion.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1 (pre-2012 overhaul)

Merger of Bicycle law articles

I'm proposing a triple merge, of Bikeway and legislation and Bicycle law in California. What do you think? I think one GA is better than a couple of stubs and a start article. Bearian (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Bicycle law in the United States would seem to a better target, as it's more specific. However, I even there I think that a merge wouldn't be helpful because it would unbalance the target, with too much information on one state. Having a 26-referenence stand-alone article seems fine. Klbrain (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks. Bearian (talk) 18:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nettrom/sandbox/WikiProject Law stub predictions agrees with you, Klbrain. Will not merge. Bearian (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closing; no merge. Klbrain (talk) 21:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]