Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Nanggulon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 09:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Juxlos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 241 past nominations.

Juxlos (talk) 03:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: 2165 B and created five days before nom. Found no other issues except what I pointed out here. Wasn't sure if "heavy" violated NPOV but then the Brill ref cites multiple sources so I cleared it. I'll also revise with an ALT1 - added for clearer syntax - that I'll let the promoter approve if nom doesn't object: ALT1: ... that the grave of a Dutch officer and his dog who were killed in the Battle of Nanggulon is a designated cultural object in Indonesia? @Juxlos: fix these and you're good to go. ミラP@Miraclepine 17:40, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Miraclepine: See the note at the bottom of Carey 2015; p651: "This was a sizeable structure, the third largest ever built by the Dutch, capable of housing 221 troops and defended by several canon"; reworded the article slightly. Juxlos (talk) 05:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Juxlos: Got it, though J. H. C. and H. V. need to be either cited or removed before I can approve. ミラP@Miraclepine 14:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Miraclepine: It's in some of the prior editions of the Dutch-language book. Bit inconvenient to find it exactly, so I changed the infobox a bit. The major is less relevant to the battle anyway. Captain's name is in the cited source, added inline. Juxlos (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Juxlos: Well with the source discrepancy fixed, good to go. I can't approve ALT1, so I'll let a promoter decide. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]