Talk:Battle of Mandalgarh/GA1

GA review

Unsuccessful. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Garudam (talk · contribs) 21:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to fail this nomination under criterion #3, breadth. It's well written enough, but simply doesn't have the breadth generally expected of GAs. For an example of typical article length, here's an example of a somewhat obscure late medieval battle that I think does it quite well. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.