Jump to content

Talk:Ashtar (extraterrestrial being)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Ashtar Command)

Further editing

[edit]

Van Tassel appears to have a unique place in the establishment of religious ufology so I'll fill this in. There also seems to be a trail of various channelers claiming the same source, i.e. Ashtar, that can do with more detail. As far as I know, Helland is the only scholar who's written in depth on this movement, and there are other bits and pieces, so these are the WP:RS I'll be using. Jyddcc (talk) 21:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where not included, the authors need to be added to the references. I'll do this as I go along. Jyddcc (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC) Jyddcc (talk) 23:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the Ashtar Command Section text needs editing that doesn't correctly reflect the information from the source, i.e. Helland. Will do this. Jyddcc (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed the Wojcik reference in the Tuella section as it does not contain this material. All the material in this section comes from Helland. Jyddcc (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve deleted the Reece p138 ref to Yvonne Cole, as it does not contain this material. The info is from Helland p173. Have added an accessible reference for the Connecting Link Magazine material from Cole, as can't find this magazine on the web. Jyddcc (talk) 23:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reference for the text about the Southern Television broadcast under “Developments after the mid-1990s” is not in Helland as claimed, so have deleted this. Obviously, if someone can find a correct reference then re-insert it. It will be intact in the history Jyddcc (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished my editing of this entry now. Jyddcc (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is marvelous work. Thank you, Jyddcc.--Cúchullain t/c 04:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Organization

[edit]

This article should surely be on the group and not the entity. The sources largely focus on the group. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]