Talk:Armed Forces Benefit Football Game
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armed Forces Benefit Football Game article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]
( )
- ... that an American football game had missiles set up in firing position on the field?
- Source: "Display Nikes at U.S. Army football game": "During pre-game flag raising ceremonies, the 31-foot missiles will be raised from a horizontal position into firing position. They will remain upright during the game."
- ALT1: ... that Soldier Field hosted football games for soldiers but not anymore? Source: Page 140 of Soldier Field: A Stadium and Its City (2009): "Though Soldier Field was dedicated to U.S. war dead, for years after the Armed Forces Games ended in 1971, when the Bears moved full-time to the venue, it hosted few, if any, official ceremonies or events honoring war dead or veterans until 2003, after its renovation.
- ALT2: ... that the Chicago Bears created an exhibition football game in partnership with the military? Source: New York Giants, Chicago Bears To Play for Service
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Karl Braun (botanist)
- Comment: First two hooks are more snappy (though could be reworded some) and my preference, while ALT2 is a more professional one if decorum is preferred. Will do QPQ later.
Moved to mainspace by ZappaOMatic (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 101 past nominations.
Zappa⚡Matic 10:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC).
- Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work! Article looks good. Hooks are interesting, with a preference for the original hook. Just waiting on QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: QPQ complete. Zappa⚡Matic 06:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class National Football League articles
- Low-importance National Football League articles
- WikiProject National Football League articles
- C-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know