Talk:Archedictyon
 | A fact from Archedictyon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,100 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rating
[edit]I suggest an simple image of the structure. The mastotermes image is a nice one, but it's focus isn't archedictyon. I'm also not sure the article isn't B-class.Heds (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Concrete suggestions, rather than "rating"
[edit]- "the common ancestor of all winged insects some 200 million years ago" The date is a typo; what date is suggested in the given source?
- I got that from [1] here. If it's wrong, I'll just omitt it. - House of Scandal (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- There are already dragonflies in the Carboniferous. But I'm an amateur in this.--Wetman (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Archedictyon is singular. To avoid the plural archedictya ("vein networks") one might say "examples of archedictyon".
- Should we avoid including the plural? - House of Scandal (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- My reservation is, does archedictya sound pretentious? "Archedictyon are.." isn't good.--Wetman (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Brogniart in 1854: Charles Jules Edmée Brongniart's dates (1859-1899).
I have made some simple additions to the text.--Wetman (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Think it's actually Adolphe-Théodore Brongniart? - I think it is and will change it. House of Scandal (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for engaging and improving the article. You can probably do more to help it at this stage than I can. - House of Scandal (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- I wish I were more adept in this area. But a paleoentymologist will arrive shortly, no doubt!--Wetman (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Archedictyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718163017/http://www.famu.org/mayfly/pubs/pub_w/pubwoottonr2000p129.pdf to http://www.famu.org/mayfly/pubs/pub_w/pubwoottonr2000p129.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080924204426/http://phasmid-study-group.org:80/glossary to http://phasmid-study-group.org/glossary
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)