Talk:Aramaic inscription of Yanouh

Lebanon Low‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Phoenicia Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

(

)

... that the second century BC Aramaic inscription of Yanouh is the first attested use of Aramaic as a public language in Mount Lebanon? Source: Aliquot 2003, p. 189
- ALT1: ... that the use of Aramaic in the second century BC Aramaic inscription of Yanouh contrasts with contemporary use of Phoenician in inscriptions from Byblos, implying a different political or cultural authority in the region? Source: Briquel-Chatonnet 2005, pp. 7–8
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Parasitic ants

Created by Elias Ziade (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

New enough, long enough and well-written. The hooks are interesting and supported by reliable sources. No image, so no license issues. Nice article without problems. The only thing lacking is a QPQ. Ping me when it is done and this should be good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]