Talk:Anna Maria Jopek

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Song Contests Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Song Contests, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of song contest-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Song ContestsWikipedia:WikiProject Song ContestsTemplate:WikiProject Song ContestsSong Contests
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Wikipedia is written from a Neutral point of view - you can't just praise your favourite artist :-). Please just add factual, unbiased information. Dan100 (Talk) 10:17, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

You are right. I have readded the "music" part but this time i've cut all the praise words and stuff :). Now it's much more a "fact" article then a "she is the best" one :) And next time - don't delete everything from the article - its much better to just edit it if it has some important information. Thanks ;) --sturm 22:22, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Soucres

tell me what is wrong with sources that i have used, why ZPAV, OLiS, Interia.pl and Universal Music Poland are not good sources, i can remove iTunes if thats the problem, but as i have mentioned on your discussion page, everyone use Itunes as source for digital download format 66.102.129.154 (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As sources, Olis is effectively a mirror of ZPAV, which provides its info, and Interia.pl is a search engine- and one particularly useful to spammers, acc. the same link you provided!!!. So your sources, when put to the test of reliability, are rapidly reducing in number. Ciao! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OLiS is provided by ZPAV, and its not a mirror, all articles on Wikipedia use both ZPAV and OLiS, Interia.pl is not a search engine, its a web portal and a popular search engine 66.102.129.154 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The point of course being that the first two are effectively the same source and the latter self-referencing. As I said, these sources define as WP:BOLLOCKS. Sorry pal

_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ZPAV page is linking to OLiS, to see full chart you need to go to OLiS archive, its not the same source, and it is not a mirror, and search engine on Interia is fixed with Google, so its not a search engine on its own 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Independant, secondary sources. Ergo, not a search engine. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tell my why linking to Billboard page to provide chart postions is ok, and any others national charts, and why in this case its wrong 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and in fact OLiS numbers are counted by TNS Poland on request from ZPAV, so ZPAV in fact, and other national charts are secondary source, in relation Nielsen SoundScan counts sales for Billboard 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to remove all unsourced personal bio too; I'm sure you understand. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and one more thing, when you put on your page link to Google it doesn't make your page search engine, Interia was search engine on the beginning, and does not index pages on their own 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i don't understand, when you can't respond on a question you search other guidelines to prove i'm wrong, and you ignore questions, see how many pages links to ZPAV, and OLiS on Wikipedia 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is Google a reliable source on its own? I'm sorry, you are becoming somewhat incoherent. Are you going into meltdown? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your responses are still offensive, and as i sad you don't answer the questions 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:32, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i did change sources for Wirtualna Polska and Onet.pl, i also add others source for chart positions, hopefully it will be enough 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So many bullets?

Thanks for contributing this article about this fine artist. :?) I'm just wondering: Why did you use all those bullets in your tables? Bullets are usually necessary only when you present a list of items between paragraphs, to distinguish the list from the text. The items here are already in table cells (and are short enough to fit the cells without wrapping), so the tables would be much less cluttered without the bullets. Just a suggestion.