The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
I recently removed the following: " AIER has a history of promoting climate change denial. During the COVID-19 pandemic, AIER promoted a herd immunity strategy in the Great Barrington Declaration, which was condemned by many public health experts but influenced some policies in the United States and United Kingdom."
This content, while mixed with varying degrees of fact, cannot be written in wiki-WP:VOICE. Additionally, it is WP:UNDUE for the lead, and should be re-written significantly or addressed with some detail and attribution in the body. Furthermore, now that this talk page discussion has been initiated, no content should be restored until the talk page discussion here is settled with a consensus for inclusion of any similar content per WP:ONUS, "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." Iljhgtn (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I'm a fan of wp:onus, but it says the opposite of what you are saying, that the onus is on the the person seeking to put the material (back) in. North8000 (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The consensus to include what is pretty much the only third-party content from the article doesn't just disappear every single month. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest keeping that stuff out. First, climate change denial means denying the main well accepted tenets of climate change. The sources don't establish that. Second, every such thing has people / "sources" who are political opponents and cherrypicking and platforming those comments is a bad thing to do in an article. Better to be informative rather that trying to find a way to put in vague negative epitaphs. North8000 (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
