Talk:Agile business intelligence

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agile business intelligence article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 2 March 2013 by reviewer Davidwr (talk · contribs).

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Reference

Sorry. Noob here trying to make edits on the article referenced "Getting a fast start with agile BI development." I think I am doing more damage. Any assistance would be apprecaited. Casey24601 (talk) 18:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be good now! Viv Desjardin (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Casey24601 (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on this article's cohesiveness

I've taken some time to clean up the peacock language in this article, but there's still a lot of work to do to make this article feel more encyclopedic. I think it's a little hard to avoid on a topic as buzzy as "agile" and "business intelligence", but in my opinion a big part of the issue is that this article feels like a list of listicles. It might be worth taking a look at a more complete article (e.g. Agile software development) and restructuring it accordingly. Specifically, the way that each section essentially serves as a summary for a particular article makes it feel a lot less cohesive and more promotional. Viv Desjardin (talk) 07:01, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:17, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agile Business Intelligence → Agile business intelligence – This is just a process that is not a name of a company or service. However, the capitalization is used in many articles on the internet, so I am bringing this up for discussion. Stuffinwriting (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~

RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 22:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UwU.Raihanur: Do you have a reason for opposing? See WP:LOWERCASE. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 00:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed move is unnecessary as it only changes capitalization, which does not significantly impact readability or clarity. The current title is fine as is. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 14:43, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"does not significantly impact readability or clarity" WP:LOWERCASE is part of the WP:AT policy, and policies are supposed to be followed as is (with exception to WP:IAR, which can't apply). There is also WP:Naming conventions (capitalization) which goes into more detail regarding capitalization. In that policy, it says the following, and I quote: Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper name.

Also, MOS:PROPERNAMES doesn't apply here as Agile Business Intelligence is not a proper noun. Yours truly, Stuffinwriting | talk 19:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand... RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 20:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:LOWERCASE and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization). See also above. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 19:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above.

RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 20:15, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Made a few changes

I made some changes to (hopefully) make this article slightly more encyclopedic.

Retitled many sections to better fit, since most of them are showing specific studies and journals, and retitled them to disclose the contents.
Removed inappropriate use of boldface per MOS:NOBOLD.
Removed the Definition section (it's just the lead but shorter).
Some other minor changes.

The edits are open for WP:BRD discussion processes. Yours truly, Stuffinwriting | talk | sign | contributions 20:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]