Talk:Adam Graham

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

England Start‑class Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Adam Graham be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in England may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

On 21 February 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Adam Graham (American politician) to Adam Graham. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 21 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🩸 (talk) 15:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Graham (American politician) → Adam Graham – This is a proposal to reverse what looks like a recent undiscussed move. This person is the primary topic because this they have the only article with this name, the other meaning is a redirect to an article with a different name. We should retain the hatnote. PatGallacher (talk) 02:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy support as this is the only article with the title. A redirect does not usually count unless there is overwhelming evidence that the redirect is the primary topic, which is not the case here. cookie monster 755 13:13, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I'm not even sure why the politician has an article. As the mayor of a city with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants, he has zero notability. The rapist, on the other hand, has been the centre of a major legal case in the UK. Rename to simple Adam Graham (politician) though. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If you think the politician has zero notability then raise a delete proposal, but unless he is deleted then we have to accept that his article exists. PatGallacher (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - Indeed. But that doesn't make him the primary topic! -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support with no hatnote in line with MOS:GENDERID. The redirect probably violates the MOS. (If a living transgender or non-binary person was not notable under a former name (a deadname), the former name should not be included in any page (including lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc.), even in quotations, even if reliable sourcing exists.)

TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.