Talk:Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co. is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The implications section seems to be giving someone's personal analyses and arguments. It's not what I expect when I read a Wikipedia article. Sorry, I can't point to any Wikipedia policy on it, but it just doesn't seem right and that it should be removed or have some external references or expert opinions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.195.73 (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Access Now, Inc

The article doesn't mention the plaintiff, Access Now, Inc (not to be confused with accessnow.org). I can't find much about them right now, but their website is [1] --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]