Talk:AV1
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AV1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WebM supported or not?
[edit]This page states "as a matter of formality, AV1 has not been sanctioned into the subset of Matroska known as WebM as of late 2019". However, the WebM page says "It also supports the new AV1 codec." I'm clear on the details, so I didn't change this myself. This reddit has more info. - kentyman (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Proposed summary for technical prose
[edit]I've been using Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental large language model to create summaries for the most popular articles with {{Technical}} templates. This article, AV1, has such a template in the "Levels" section. Here is the paragraph summary at grade 5 reading level which Gemini 2.5 Pro suggested for that section:
- AV1 video uses different "levels," which are like steps showing how hard a video is to play. These levels go from 2.0 up to 6.3. A lower level, like 2.0, might be for a small video, while a higher level, like 5.1 or 6.2, is needed for very clear, big videos like those on 4K or 8K TVs. What level a device like your phone or computer can play depends on how powerful it is.
While I have read and may have made some modifications to that summary, I am not going to add it to the section because I want other editors to review, revise if appropriate, and add it instead. This is an experiment with a few dozen articles initially to see how these suggestions are received, and after a week or two, I will decide how to proceed. Thank you for your consideration. Cramulator (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC) (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Use of LLM needs to be discussed by the entire Wikipedia community, not just those interested in one article. You can start at WP:Village pump. Sundayclose (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I am retracting this and the other LLM-generated suggestions due to clear negative consensus at the Village Pump. I will be posting a thorough postmortem report in mid-April to the source code release page. Thanks to all who commented on the suggestions both negatively and positively, and especially to those editors who have manually addressed the overly technical cleanup issue on six, so far, of the 68 articles where suggestions were posted. Cramulator (talk) 01:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- B-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- B-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- B-Class Computer hardware articles
- Low-importance Computer hardware articles
- B-Class Computer hardware articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
- B-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class electronic articles
- Low-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles
- B-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- B-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class computer graphics articles
- Mid-importance computer graphics articles
- WikiProject Computer graphics articles