This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Method engineering, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Method engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Method engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Method engineeringMethod engineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University College London/MSIN1003 Information World (Autumn 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
Point taken. By all means integrate into brainstorming if you'd like to. Just strikes me some academic thinking went into it, including articles, so it looked like an issue big enough to warrant separate treatment. BuzzWoof (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only article I see referenced here is in a German sales magazine? It doesn't look particularly academic or scientifically validated, tbh. Destynova (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Many articles are only referenced in public media, without scientific validation. The technique is used frequently in business. Doubtless one day it will be researched more thoroughly, but for the moment it warrants an article imho (or, as discussed above, integrate it into brainstorming. BuzzWoof (talk) 07:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This page seems to have been page protected incorrectly. BusterD created an edit noting the page was protected but that does not seem to be the case as DumbBOT removed the pp icon. The IP 200.36.253.48 did a small bit vandalism adding useless links a week or so ago that I have reverted as obvious vandalism. KindlingFlame (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The protection was applied correctly, for a two day period. I made no edits to the page other than the protection itself; typically the page watchers are better at cleaning up than any uninvolved admin. The bot removed the icon after expiration. BusterD (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
