Talk:2024 Romanian presidential election

Yes but no.

The article is disinformation and a shame for a site that wants to be an encyclopedia. There is no proof for the statement "Russia was involved in the elections". Absolutely no proof. The only thing that was reproached to the candidate Calin Georgescu is that which would be influenced the Tik Tok algorithms to promote himself. This is also a false argument because all the candidates were present on Tik Tok and Calin Georgescu had less views than other candidates and yet he was the one who won the first round. Over 9 million people voted democratically and almost 2 million voted for Calin Georgescu. A coup d'état actually took place in Romania. 86.126.133.250 (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to add such information to the article. However, this isn't something made up by Wikipedia, since everything on Wikipedia is based on sources from outside the website. Polish kurd (talk) 01:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

The campaign was influenced by a Russian network on social media (1). Denial of the election interference is only a conspiracy theory. Gdaniel111 (talk) 17:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

No proof to this day.Saying otherwise is just false information.

If there had been the slightest evidence that would show this, Calin Georgescu would not be free without any charge or evidence against him. The declassified files show zero evidence for Russia's involvement in the elections. Because these elections were annulled for no reason, without proof, it means, according to definitions, exactly what a coup d'etat is, and those involved in this coup d'état are the same communists who took power in 1989, also following a coup d'état. 86.126.133.245 (talk) 18:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Why would Calin Georgescu not be free? There is no direct connection with him, the Russian network only supported him. Gdaniel111 (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Again this is an enciclopedia website ,saying something is not proof.There is zero proof for your statement,in fact it doesn't make any sense.

The only accusation without evidence was that Georgescu was promoted more on tik tok than other opponents, statements that also turned out to be false, his opponents having more views on tik tokviews paid from public money, but they had a much worse result than Calin Georgescu, precisely because Romanians showed their desire through democratic voting, As a matter of fact, it is important to note that the Creator of the Universe, the Creator of the Universe, is the Creator of the Universe. Lasconi was, by definition, pro-European, and even criticized the annulment very harshly, invoking the Constitution and the values of democracy. 86.126.133.245 (talk) 11:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

The only direct accusation, without evidence, was that Georgescu was promoted more on tik tok than other opponents, statements that also proved to be false, his opponents having more views on tik tok views paid for with public money, but they have had a much weaker result than Călin Georgescu, precisely because the Romanians showed their desire through a democratic vote, when they elected Călin Georgescu democratically and freely.

And Georgescu was ignored by the televisions, televisions that collected millions of euros from the other candidates.

That's why the only platform on which Georgescu promoted himself was tik tok.

And it's funny to say that he was promoted unequally on tik tok when in fact he was discriminated against by televisions throughout the campaign when, although the law says that equal space should be granted to all candidates, he was only invited once or twice to a television station and when he was invited he was alone in the studio, he was not invited to the electoral debate.

Many of his supporters were called to the police to give statements for Facebook posts because they supported Calin Georgescu.Why was Iulian Capsali and many others called to the police? If Georgescu was not involved in anything, even if there was evidence of Russian involvement, why were people intimidated by the police and harassed for posts on Facebook or titk tok in which they show disagreement with the CCR decision or the support of the candidate Calin Georgescu? Because there is too much democracy in Romania?

Anyone who wants to see, sees the "democracy" in Romania.

It is funny to say now that it is normal to be free when he was permanently accused without evidence of direct ties to Russia, he was named a legionnaire, it was mentioned in the press that he has paid mercenaries who want to destabilize Romania, and many people typical communist propaganda for a third world state not for a member country EU and NATO.

Canceling a democratic process, in this case the very essence of democracy based on non-existent statements and evidence, means the exact opposite of democracy.

And it would have been the duty of those who say they support democracy to fight for the respect of the people's vote, especially when the other candidate with whom Georgescu met in the second round, Lasconi was by definition pro-European and even criticized the cancellation very harshly citing the Constitution and democratic values.

Sorry for the previous comment, admins maybe you want to delete it, the "creator of the universe" was added for reasons that only google knows "it has no relevance and importance to the message. It's a translation mistake. 86.126.133.245 (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, a lot of statements without any referencing. We don't work like that on Wikipedia. For every statement we have to provide a reference. I provided for mine above and there's even more. Even Donald Trump was supported by Russia as you can see from this article, that doesn't mean Trump will be arrested for this. Same goes for Calin Georgescu.

P.S.: If you want to delete your own duplicate comments, you can. Gdaniel111 (talk) 14:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Repeating an idea endlessly does not magically transform it into truth. There is not even a single piece of evidence for Russia's intervention in the electoral process, nor for the promotion of the candidate Calin Georgescu. Therefore, there is no real and legal basis for canceling the elections. What source do you want? Source for harassing people for facebook posts? You can find them on google. A happy New Year Daniel. It would have been something if you weren't exactly from Romania. The definition of democracy, but its essence is the right to vote and to be voted for. Can someone explain to us how nine people canceled this right for 19 million people and how this can be called democracy considering that the people voted democratically on Calin Georgescu and Lasconi? Doesn't democracy mean letting the people choose between one and the other? 86.126.133.170 (talk) 20:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

I don't think this section is helpful in any way as it doesn't improve the article. As stated above: This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. We can talk about the statements and information using reliable sources (as asked by myself and user Polish kurd above) or what to include in the article. The objective of talk pages is to improve the encyclopedia, not pointless conversation without sources. If I want to talk with someone about a subject I have Whatsapp, Facebook and Tiktok; I don't need to use Wikipedia's talk pages. This isn't Facebook. I don't have to prove something to someone or to persuade. My job on Wikipedia isn't to prove my point.

As for the Russian interference I will include the references, the facts and the opinions against it in that article. As for the cancelled election, this isn't the first one in history or in a democracy. You should check the categories of this article for more on the subject. Again, it's not the objective of the talk pages to be a forum or an information desk. Thank you. Gdaniel111 (talk) 20:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Still waiting for the links about Russia interference..It was not me talking like Wikipedia was a forum but you claiming IT was Russia and that you have proof.No proof until today. 86.126.133.37 (talk) 11:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

You won't believe it no matter the burden of proof so what's the point? Since English Wikipedia is filled with far-right Romanians there is no point in adding it in English Wikipedia. As you can see in that article's history or other articles on Romanian political issues, the content is altered to fit their narrative. As far as I know we have one of the highest percentages of far-right members in Parliament in all the Europe. Gdaniel111 (talk) 12:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

"2024–2025 Romanian presidential election" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2024–2025 Romanian presidential election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20 § 2024–2025 Romanian presidential election until a consensus is reached. Shamrockwikiedit (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

"2024–25 Romanian presidential election" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2024–25 Romanian presidential election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20 § 2024–25 Romanian presidential election until a consensus is reached. Shamrockwikiedit (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Snoop.ro article on the election and responsible

They claim it was a liberal campaign that tarnished Georgescu.

https://snoop.ro/campania-pnl-de-pe-tiktok-ajunsa-sa-l-sustina-pe-georgescu-a-fost-ideea-lui-rares-bogdan-am-stiut-dar-de-online-nu-m-am-ocupat-eu/ 80.163.57.8 (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Article mentions inconsistent number of debates

There are 38 debates mentioned and documented here, yet the start of the section mentions "30 televised, six on the radio and three online.". The table given supports that there were only two online debates unless I am misinterpreting something, regardless it does not add up. Ink Dude0 (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2025 (UTC)