Talk:2023 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 400 metres/GA1

GA review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 02:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Editør (talk · contribs) 17:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 00:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will take on this article for review. I will have my comments up within one week. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

Add (s) to the first time seconds are mentioned in the lead since you use that abbreviation throughout the article.
Twenty-seven athletes of sixteen nations... change "of" to "from" each time this is brought up. Same for ...twelve competing athletes of ten nations... and ...six remaining athletes of four nations...
There was a target number of 30 athletes in total, with a maximum of three athletes per nation. Change to "thirty" since in the rest of the article, integers are written in words rather than numerals

2. Verifiable
The YouTube video reference is from the official European Athletics channel so can be used per WP:RSPYT. Everything else is reliable as well. Passes Earwig's copyvio detector. Spot check: 1, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 18 all verified the information and did not have copyright violations.

3. Broad
This article covers the main aspects of the race. I don't think there's much more you can say in an article about an individual race.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
The article history and talk page do not indicate any ongoing disputes.

6. Illustrated
Images are relevant, have suitable captions, and are free use.

@Editør: That is all I have! -Riley1012 (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I believe I've made all the changes you suggested. Let me know if there is anything else or that I've missed. – Editør (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012 Oh, I think I misunderstood what you meant with the "(s)" comment when I changed each "seconds" to "s" in the lead. In general: isn't the abbreviation "s" so common and international it doesn't need to be explained? – Editør (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose so. I just thought it might be helpful, but it is not a big deal. I will pass this article. -Riley1012 (talk) 02:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.