Jump to content

Talk:2022 Peach Bowl/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 17:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 15:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will review this article. I will have my initial comments up in the next few days. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

2. Verifiable
The sources used are reliable. Passes Earwig's Copyvio check. Spot check: 5, 9, 14, 19, 22, 23, 29, 30 - All fine.

3. Broad

4. Neutral and 5. Stable
No concerns for either criterion.

6. Illustrated
No images, unfortunately.

Hi @PCN02WPS: my suggestions are in bullet points. -Riley1012 (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.