Talk:2022 Fiesta Bowl (December)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 02:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 20:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I think the game summary is too heavy and excessive and could probably come down in size quite a bit. Only minor changes are needed elsewhere. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@PCN02WPS Any movement on this? Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 04:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sammi Brie thank you for the ping - things have gotten quite busy over the last week IRL (although, admittedly, I haven't worked on this in 16 days) but I will do my absolute best to have it finished by the end of the day tomorrow. Sorry for the delay. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sammi Brie All ready for another look now! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:34, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Much better. Going to pass. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:12, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

Lead

• After a TCU punt, Michigan suffered a turnover on downs and the game concluded with TCU receiving the national championship bid. Comma after "downs" WP:CINS
  • Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Teams

• The Horned Frogs entered the CFP after facing the longest odds of any team to ever do so at 200–1, and entered this game as underdogs by 7.5 points. Remove comma CINS
  • Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• enters the game Should be "entered"
  • Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Game summary

• I think this could be slimmed down by about half. The by-quarter paragraphs are huge and contain probably excessive detail.
  • I will work on this in the coming days. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• 10-yard-line "10-yard line" etc. (this occurs multiple times in the recap)
  • Fixed all. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• 11-yard-line. From there, Duggan rushed three times and gained 3, 1, and 2 yards, the last of which reached the end zone for a touchdown. There are five yards not accounted for here. Penalty?
  • Fixed for now though this will probably get cut when I slim the summary down. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Michigan started the second quarter with a 2nd & 5 from the TCU 24-yard-line, and were unable to pick up the required yardage on their next two plays. Remove comma CinS
  • Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Sourcing and spot checks

Reviewed: 4, 9, 10, 18, 20

No issues.

Images

Are there any relevant images available?

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.