Talk:2021 Bowling Green tornadoes

2021 Bowling Green tornadoes is currently an Earth sciences good article nominee. Nominated by E_F⁵ at 01:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: 2021 tornadoes in Kentucky

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 Bowling Green tornadoes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: EF5 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Queen of Hearts (talk · contribs) 05:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

Alright, I will review this. I immediately see the following issues:

The lead is far too long – this should at most be three paragraphs, not six. For some suggestions on how to shorten this, I think both tornados can be merged into one paragraph, and I think the last paragraph can be merged into the above one.

Three? I've shortened it but it's still four. E_F⁵ 22:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are several unsourced paragraphs (which User:Phlsph7/HighlightUnreferencedPassages can help highlight)

Done, re-added and removed some specific company names not mentioned in the ArcGIS source (let me know if you need help navigating through it, it's a bit complicated). E_F⁵ 22:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are four citation needed tags

Done, removed the entire table. Per my writing style all deaths need to be cited; the citations were removed as unreliable post-nom. E_F⁵ 22:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I think I would be within discretion to quickfail this, you are a competent GA writer and most of this wasn't added by you, so I am putting this on hold for now; if you resolve these issues within a reasonable timeframe, I will continue the review. Cheers, charlotte ^👸♥ 05:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay. Beginning the full review: charlotte ^👸♥ 02:58, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Full review

Spotcheck

Randomly generated from Special:Permalink/1284990616

2 Y
3 Y
10
17
18
19
27
28
28
30

@Queen of Hearts: It's been over 20 days since you picked up the review, are you still reviewing? E_F⁵ 12:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EF5, apologies for taking so long – yes, I intend to continue this review. Sorry, charlotte ^👸♥ 06:56, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]