Jump to content

Talk:2011 Ringgold–Apison tornado/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: EF5 (talk · contribs) 01:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 00:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this as part of GARC Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Lead

[edit]
Mention that its a part of the 2011 Super Outbreak it the lead.
I already have, although it's linked as a different name ("The tornado was part of the largest outbreak of tornadoes in recorded history"). EF5 15:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Images are

Meteorological synopsis

[edit]

Seems fine

Tornado summary

[edit]
Who is Anna Montgomery? Also unsourced
"After the tornado, a man would be arrested after he was found looting tornado-damaged homes in the neighborhood." seems inappropriately placed as the following line discusses events during the tornado. Maybe move to aftermath?

Aftermath

[edit]
Add some prose around the economic losses.
 Done. EF5 16:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Cut the fatalities subheading as the section isn't long enough to justify a subsection.
 Done. EF5 16:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes and footnotes

[edit]
Should the section be named references?
 Done. EF5 16:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't footnotes be citations?
 Done. EF5 16:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Misc

[edit]

Why is TornadoTalk reliable?

They cite all information within their summaries, eliminating OR. I'd even go as far as to call them subject experts in the tornado field, although that consensus hasn't been reached as a community. It's a relatively newer source, so we'll see. EF5 15:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Earwig doesn't flag anything major
Change ref 33 to "The Chattanoogan" for consistency.
 Done. EF5 16:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Images are from commons with the exception of the tornado which is a valid free use image.
Images need alttext
 Done. EF5 16:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

[edit]

That's what I found, ping me when done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EF5: reminder Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant: Issues addressed. EF5 16:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.