Jump to content

Neovenator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neovenator
Temporal range: Hauterivian–Barremian Possible Berriasian records
Reconstructed skeleton in Japan
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Clade: Allosauria
Clade: Carcharodontosauria
Family: Neovenatoridae
Genus: Neovenator
Hutt, Martill & Barker, 1996
Species:
N. salerii
Binomial name
Neovenator salerii
Hutt, Martill & Barker, 1996

Neovenator (nˈiːə͡ʊvˌɛne͡ɪtə; "new hunter") is a genus of carcharodontosaurian theropod dinosaur. It is known primarily from several skeletons found in the Early Cretaceous (Hauterivian-Barremian) Wessex Formation on the south coast of the Isle of Wight, southern England. The first remains of Neovenator were discovered in 1978 alongside those of the ornithopod Brighstoneus, after the collapse of part of Grange Chine. Its remains were initially overlooked, due in part to their incompleteness, though upon the recognition of its significance by Dr. William Blows, an effort to find more remains began. Though originally believed to be a new species of Megalosaurus, its nature as an allosauroid became clear fairly quickly. In 1996, Steve Hutt, David Martill and Michael Barker named the genus Neovenator. One species is known: the type species, N. salerii, after the Salero family who owned the site on which its remains were discovered.

Between the type specimen and multiple referred specimens, roughly seventy percent of Neovenator's skeleton is known. While incompletely known, it was likely around 7 metres (23 ft) in length, and probably weighed 1 t (1.1 short tons). though a specimen possibly referrable to the genus indicates a larger body size of 10 metres (33 ft). Its skull is known from both premaxillae, and parts of the left maxilla, right nasal, right palatine, and the front portion of a dentary. The snout of Neovenator is covered in rugosities, similar to carcharodontosaurids and to abelisaurids, which indicates either that it had an extensive blood supply (possibly for thermoregulation), or that it had an extensive neurovascular system, possibly for tactile purposes. However, this hypothesis has seen scrutiny. Teeth found in association with the type specimen of Neovenator, while they do possess the characteristic enamel wrinkles of carcharodontosaur teeth, differ in their precise pattern.

The taxonomic position of Neovenator has been a subject of debate. Prior to its description, its fragmentary remains led to a tenative referral to Megalosaurus. The authors who described the genus suggested that it was a British representative of Allosauridae, or at least closely related to Allosaurus. In a 2008 monograph on the osteology of Neovenator, a position within the clade Carcharodontosauria was suggested. Four years later, it was given a family of its own, Neovenatoridae. The validity of this group is uncertain, though, since its definition includes megaraptorans, a theropod clade which many subsequent studies have found to be part of the clade Coelurosauria.

Neovenator is best known from the Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, though teeth possibly referrable to the genus have been recovered from the Angeac-Charente bone bed in France. Bite marks found on the fossil of an iguanodontid, Mantellisaurus, suggest that it was among Neovenator's prey base. Like many fossils of the closely-related Allosaurus, the type specimen of Neovenator bears numerous pathologies.

Discovery and species

[edit]
Mounted skeleton and fossils, Dinosaur Isle

The first bones of Neovenator were discovered in the summer of 1978 when a storm made part of the Grange Chine collapse. Rocks containing fossils fell to the beach of Brighstone Bay on the southwestern coast of the Isle of Wight.[1] The rocks consisted of plant debris bed L9 within the variegated clays and marls of the Wessex Formation,[2] dating from the Barremian stage of the Early Cretaceous, about 125 million years ago.[2][3] They were first collected by the Henwood family and shortly afterwards geology student David Richards collected additional material. Richards sent the remains to the Museum of Isle of Wight (now Dinosaur Isle) and the British Museum of Natural History. In the latter institution, palaeontologist Alan Jack Charig determined that the bones belonged to two kinds of animal: Iguanodon and a theropod. The "Iguanodon", later referred to Mantellisaurus and ultimately made the separate genus Brighstoneus,[4] generated the most interest and in the early 1980s a team was sent by the BMNH to secure more material. The theropod material, meanwhile, was fairly incomplete (consisting of vertebrae and fragments of the pelvis), and a lack of diagnostic features meant that it was ignored until its significance was recognised by Dr. William Blows.[1]

Several amateur paleontologists, among them Keith and Jenny Simmonds, now began to search for additional remains of the predator. Ultimately, the total of secured bones included the snout, teeth, the front of a mandible (lower jaw), most of the vertebral column, ribs, belly ribs, chevrons, the left shoulder girdle, pelvis bones and a hindlimb. These were accessioned under numbers BMNH R10001 and MIWG 6348. They equalled approximately 70% of the skeleton. In 1985, excavations undertaken by Steve Hutt of the MIWG revealed two vertebrae of a second individual, specimen MIWG.5470. In 1987, Jenny Simmonds found a third skeleton, containing vertebra and pelvic bones, specimen MIWG.6352. A fourth individual found by Nick Oliver is represented by specimen IWCMS 2002.186,[5] consisting of a lower jaw, parts of the cervical (neck) vertebrae and limb elements. In 1990 the material, then considered a possible new species of Megalosaurus, was provisionally described by Hutt. Having mistaken the ischium of MIWG 6352 for a pubic bone, Hutt suggested this specimen represented a separate species.[6]

In 1996, Steve Hutt, David Martill and Michael Barker named and described the type species Neovenator salerii. The generic name Neovenator means "new hunter" from the Greek neo~, "new" and Latin venator, "hunter". The specific name salerii honours the land owners of the site, the Salero family. In view of the large number of individuals involved in the discovery process, it was considered improper to single out one of them as discoverer. The holotype is the skeleton accessioned as BMNH R10001 and MIWG 6348.[2]

In 1999, Hutt dedicated his (unpublished) master thesis to Neovenator.[7] This thesis would form the foundation for a monograph discussing the osteology of the genus. That monograph was published in 2008, and was authored by Stephen L. Brusatte, Roger B. J. Benson, and Hutt by the Palaeontographical Society.[1]

In 2012, teeth indistinguishable from those associated with the holotype of Neovenator were found in the Angeac-Charente bone bed, in France,[8] dating to the Berriasian.[9] They were distinguished from those of Erectopus, a basal allosauroid also known from the Early Cretaceous of France, by differences in the carinae of their teeth.[8]

Description

[edit]

Size

[edit]
Estimated size based on the holotype

Neovenator was a mid-sized, lightly built carcharodontosaurid. The holotype specimen measured approximately 7 metres (23 ft) in length, and was fairly lightly built. Gregory S. Paul estimated its mass at around 1 t (1.1 short tons).[10] It has been suggested that the holotype may be a subadult, and if this is the case, it may not be reflective of the maximum body size of the genus. However, in 2016, Jeremy Lockwood noted that most of the elements referred to Neovenator are roughly the same size as the holotype, suggesting that adults would have had a similar body size.[11] Specimen MIWG 4199 indicates an individual with a possible length of about 10 metres (33 ft), but it only consists of a toe phalanx and its position in Neovenator is dubious.[1][12] A footprint (IWCMS:2016.273) is believed to have been left by an animal with a hip height of 2.5 metres (8.2 ft), and while the trackmaker is uncertain, it has been suggested that it was left by a mature Neovenator.[11]

Skull and dentition

[edit]
Reconstructed skull in anterior (left) and left lateral (right) views

The skull of Neovenator is not known in its entirety, but is instead represented by both premaxillae (both complete), a left maxilla, a right nasal, a right palatine, and the anterior (front) portion of a left dentary, part of the mandible. The premaxillae were longer than they were tall, measuring 8.7 cm (3.4 in) in length and 7 cm (2.8 in) in height. This condition is seen in several non-carcharodontosaurid taxa (i.e. Allosaurus and Sinraptor), but not in other, more derived carcharodontosaurs, such as Acrocanthosaurus.[1] The premaxillae have an additional connection (referred to in 2001 as a "pen-in-socket connection"), by not seen in other theropods.[13] The left maxilla, as preserved, measures around 30 cm (12 in) in length, and 7.5 cm (3.0 in) in depth. Only a small portion near where the jugal connected is missing. As in many basal tetanurans (and the more derived Carcharodontosaurus), the maxilla contributed to the posterior (rear) border of the external naris (nasal opening). Similar to abelisaurids and other allosauroids (i.e. Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus, and Sinraptor), the surface of the maxilla bore prominent rugosities, and contains a high density of foramina, particularly at its anteriormost portion, ventral to (below) the external naris. It has been suggested that Neovenator's snout was highly vascularised or innervated.[14][15] Unlike many other allosauroids and ceratosaurs, the ascending ramus lacked pneumatic excavation (hollow spaces containing air pockets).[1] A large maxillary fenestra, with a diameter roughly one-sixth of the length of the tooth row, penetrated the maxilla.[2] Similar to the maxilla, Neovenator's nasal was rugose, though the extent of its rugosity is slightly weaker than in Carcharodontosaurus. The dorsal (upper) and lateral (side) surfaces of the nasal were separated by a rugose ridge. While initially regarded as a diagnostic feature of Neovenator,[13] the same is also known in Allosaurus. As evidenced by the presence of a single large pneumatopore, the nasal was likely hollow and highly pneumatised. Similar conditions are observed in other allosauroids, though the amount of pneumatopores varied, sometimes within the same genus.[1]

The holotype of Neovenator preserved a near-complete left dentary, measuring 23.5 cm (9.3 in) in length and 6.8 cm (2.7 in), though it was lost at the time of the 2008 monograph's publication. What was written in that monograph was therefore based on figures in published works and examinations of a cast. Unlike some other carcharodontosaurs (particularly later genera such as Carcharodontosaurus and Giganotosaurus), the anterior tip of the dentary was not squared-off. It was instead rounded, as in most other theropods.[1] Unlike the maxilla and nasal, the dentary of Neovenator was fairly smooth, lacking rugosities, unlike what is seen in taxa like Carcharodontosaurus. The largest foramina present were directly ventral to the alveolar margin (the tooth row), set in a longitudinal groove which deflected ventrally at around the fifth alveolus. The third alveolus of the dentary was enlarged, which is unique among allosauroids, save for Acrocanthosaurus. When viewed from above, the alveoli on both upper and lower jaws were arranged in a weakly sinuous curve, though this may be the result of taphonomy.[1]

As preserved, Neovenator's premaxilla five alveoli (tooth sockets), and its maxilla bears fifteen, though at least one or two are likely to have been present. No teeth are preserved in the premaxilla or maxilla, and no erupted teeth are known from the dentary, though four replacement teeth are preserved. Additionally, isolated theropod teeth were found around the holotype specimen, tentatively assigned to the genus. Based on these, Neovenator's teeth were fairly typical for theropod teeth, though differ from those of other carcharodontosaurs in details of the enamel wrinkles. The teeth were asymmetrical in cross-section, due to the orientation of the distal carina.[1]

Vertebral column

[edit]

The majority of Neovenator's vertebral column is known from the holotype. Six cervical (neck) vertebrae, including the axis (the second cervical vertebra positionally), are known, as are twelve dorsal (back) vertebrae. Also known are twenty-three caudal (tail) vertebrae.[1] The front joint surface of the intercentrum of the axis was widened transversely. The odontoid process of the axis had small openings along the side edge of the front facet, and the neural process of the axis had a single small opening in the side. The more rearward cervical vertebrae were fused with their cervical ribs; while this is known in many other theropod clades, Neovenator is the only allosauroid in which this was the case.[1][16] The neural spines of the cervical vertebrae were narrow anteroposteriorly (from front-to-back), are thick transversely, and were overall rod-like in shape. The seventh was inclined posteriorly, the eighth anteriorly, and the ninth directly vertically.

First dorsal vertebra

The first two dorsal vertebrae were morphologically intermediate between the cervical and dorsal vertebrae, being, among other things, short anteroposteriorly when compared to dorsal vertebrae further along the column. The remaining dorsal vertebrae were fairly homogenous in morphology, characterised by their tall centra and biconcave articular surfaces. Each dorsal vertebra had transverse processes which are broad anteroposteriorly yet thin dorsoventrally (up-and-down). Their neural spines are subrectangular in lateral view and are thick transversely, at least in comparison to most non-allosauroid tetanurans. Two large fragments of the dorsal ribs are known, one better-preserved and coming from the left side of the torso, and the other coming from the right side. Some disarticulated gastralia (constituent bones of the gastral basket, which supported the organs and aided in respiration) are known. Sacral vertebrae are known from referred specimens. The second and third sacral vertebrae were fused, unlike Acrocanthosaurus and Sinraptor, but like some specimens of Allosaurus. The second and fourth sacrals are known exclusively from their centra, so the neural arches of the sacra are poorly known.[1]

The first caudal vertebra of the holotype is poorly preserved due to damage sustained during the cliff fall, thus leaving the second as the best preserved. Though most of the anterior and middle caudal vertebrae are damaged, the distal ones are fairly complete. The anterior caudal centra had suboval articular surfaces, and posterior surfaces smaller than the anterior surface (a pattern which continues until the vertebra tentatively identified as the twenty-second).[1]

Appendicular skeleton

[edit]

The left scapula and coracoid of Neovenator's holotype are nearly complete, though its forelimbs are not known. Around two-thirds of the glenoid fossa's length is taken up by the scapula. While well-preserved, the coracoid is damaged enough that most of the point where it articulated with the scapula is absent.[1] The shoulder joint is wider transversely than anteroposteriorly.[16] On the medial surface of the scapulocoracoid, the glenoid is buttressed by a slight ridge, which fans out posteriorly to unite with the ventral margin of the scapular blade.[1]

The ilia of Neovenator, including referred elements, are fragmentary.[1] Ventral to the ilium's front blade is a notch, which has a robust shelf on the inner side. The ilium overall is highly pneumatised.[1][16] While a right pubis is preserved, it is fragmentary, heavily abraded, and badly crushed. Distally, it expands into a large pubic boot, similar to that of other carcharodontosaurs and tyrannosaurids. The "feet" of the ischia are connected at their fronts but diverge at their rears. As in other carcharodontosaurs, and in some tyrannosaurids, Neovenator's femoral head is angled dorsomedially (upwards and towards the centrum). The lesser trochanter of the femur has a robust ridge on its outer side, and is itself extremely robust. The fourth trochanter has a depression in the form of a thumbprint located laterally on its dorsal border. The distal portion of the tibia shows an oval rough area at the inner side. The top of the outer malleolus of the tibia is pinched from the front to the rear. The outer front bulge of the top surface of the tibia has a spur deflected ventrally. In the foot, the outer side of the second metatarsal has a hollow surface to contact the third metatarsal.[1]

Classification

[edit]
Restoration

In the 1996 paper describing Neovenator, Hutt, Martill and Barker suggested a close relationship with Allosaurus, and that Neovenator might itself have been a member of Allosauridae.[2] The findings of that paper were based on morphological comparisons, rather than phylogenetic analysis.[1] The first analysis to include Neovenator was published in 2000 by Thomas R. Holtz Jr., and indeed recovered as the sister taxon to Allosaurus.[17] However, that topology was the result of incorrect scoring, and two of the characters used to unite the two genera (prezygapophysis morphology and the distal expansion of the scapula) are respectively erroneous and uncorrelated with phylogeny.[18] In a 2008 phylogenetic analysis of Allosauroidea, which slightly predated the Neovenator monograph, Steve Brusatte and Paul Sereno recovered Neovenator as the most basal member of Carcharodontosauridae.[1][18] In 2010, Brusatte, along with Roger B. J. Benson and Matt Carrano, recovered Neovenator in a similar position. However, their database included megaraptorans, which were recovered in a clade with Neovenator. Therefore, Benson, Carrano and Brusatte erected the family Neovenatoridae, to encompass both taxa.[16]

The cladogram below follows the 2010 analysis by Benson, Carrano and Brusatte.[16]

Neovenatoridae

In the years since that paper, however, an increasing number of phylogenies have recovered megaraptorans in Coelurosauria, as opposed to being sisters to Neovenator.[19][20][21] If this is the case, Neovenatoridae is likely monotypic. Fernano Novas et al. (2013) recovered Neovenator at the base of Carcharodontosauridae, in a polytomy with Eocarcharia and Concavenator.[22]

Cladogram after Novas et al., 2013[22]

Palaeobiology

[edit]

Senses

[edit]
Praemaxilla and maxilla, with neurovascular network and CT sections

Chris Barker and colleagues suggested that Neovenator may have possessed integumentary sensory organs on its snout, much as modern waterfowl and crocodilians use to find food in muddy water, based on neurovascular structures found on the skull. As Neovenator is believed to be completely terrestrial, unlike the modern species, it is assumed that these sensory organs were used for other purposes, such as sensitivity to pressure and temperature, controlling jaw pressure and precision feeding. In support of this, the tooth wear for Neovenator seems to indicate that it avoided eating or biting into bone while it fed. Additionally, Neovenator might have used these integumentary sensory organs in courtship and sensing nest conditions, a technique seen today in most species of crocodilians and megapode birds. Though such structures are known for another theropod, the tyrannosaurid Daspletosaurus horneri, Neovenator's neurovascular structures that likely supported these organs are the best preserved and most complete in any known theropod yet discovered.[15][23] However, a more recent study reviewing the evolution of the trigeminal canals among sauropsids notes that a much denser network of neurovascular canals in the snout and lower jaw is more commonly encountered in aquatic or semiaquatic taxa (e.g., Spinosaurus, Halszkaraptor, Plesiosaurus), and taxa that developed a rhamphotheca (e.g., Caenagnathasia), while terrestrial taxa such as tyrannosaurids and Neovenator may have had average facial sensitivity for non-edentulous terrestrial theropods, although further research is needed.[24]

Palaeopathology

[edit]

As with many specimens of Allosaurus, the holotype of Neovenator salerii was highly pathological.[1][25] The pathologies listed in the 1996 paper and the 2008 monograph: are the fusion of two caudal vertebrae and their associated chevron into a single mass (also seen in certain Allosaurus and likely the result of neoplastic ankylosis);[1] healed fractures to the gastralia;[25] a fracture to the scapula; one gastralium which appears to exhibit regrowth across its entire length,[1][25] and osteophytes on some of the pedal (foot) phalanges. One of the left pedal phalanges has been almost completely covered by exostotic bone growth and small lesions, suggesting osteomyelitis, similar to one specimen of Allosaurus.[1]

Palaeoecology

[edit]

Palaeoenvironment

[edit]

The only definite remains of Neovenator are known from the Barremian-age Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, though teeth identical to the genus are known from the Berriasian-age[9] Angeac-Charente bone bed in France.[8]

A selection of Wessex Formation dinosaurs. On the left is Iguanodon. In the foreground is a group of Hypsilophodon being pursued by an Eotyrannus. In the right background is a Neovenator. In the midground is a pair of basal ornithomimosaurs.

Sedimentological data suggests that the depositional environment of the Wessex Formation was a floodplain intersected by fluvial (river) and lacustrine (lake) deposits. Water levels likely varied throughout the year,[26] due to there being more evaporation than precipitation, though precipitation was regardless quite high. The Wessex seems to have regularly experienced extreme storms[27] and periodic flood events, resulting in debris flows which would have deposited dead organisms in ponds.[28] Burned plant and insect material and fusain suggests that the environment experienced frequent wildfires, stifling for the most part the dense growth of gymnosperms.[26][28] Much of the flora of the formed of low ground cover, consisting primarily of pteridophytes, with occasional stands of conifers, cycads, and the tree fern Tempskya.[26] Most vertebrate material from the Wessex Formation originates from plant debris beds, resulting from the aforementioned flooding events.[28] Aside from Neovenator, the dinosaur fauna of the Isle of Wight include the theropods Aristosuchus, Calamospondylus, Ceratosuchops, Eotyrannus, Ornithodesmus, Riparovenator, and Thecocoelurus, the sauropods Chondrosteosaurus, Eucamerotus, and Ornithopsis,[29][30] the thyreophorans Polacanthus[30] and Vectipelta,[31] and the ornithopods Brighstoneus,[4] Comptonatus,[32] Hypsilophodon, Iguanodon,[30] Mantellisaurus,[33] Valdosaurus,[29][30] and Vectidromeus.[34] The pterosaur fauna of the Wessex Formation consists of Coloborhynchus, Caulkicephalus, Istiodactylus,[35] Vectidraco,[36] and Wightia;[37] multiple unnamed pterosaur taxa, including a ctenochasmatid, are also known.[35] Neosuchian crocodyliforms include Bernissartia, Koumpiodontosuchus,[38] and Vectisuchus.[39] Limited evidence exists of elasmosaurids and leptocleidid plesiosaurs.[40] The mammal fauna of the Wessex Formation includes the multituberculate Eobataar[41] and the spalacotheriid Yaverlestes.[42] Albanerpetontid amphibians are represented by Wesserpeton.[3] The fish fauna of the Wessex Formation, both bony and cartilaginous, is extensive, including hybodontiform and selachimorph sharks, pycnodontiforms, Lepidotes, and Scheenstia.[43] Invertebrates are represented by an assortment of non-biting midges,[44] hymenopterans (wasps) including multiple parasitoid taxa,[45] coleopterans (beetles), the avicularoid spider Cretamygale,[46] and the ostracod Cypridea.[47]

If Neovenator was indeed present during in the older Angeac-Charente bone bed, it would have been part of an entirely different, less well-understood faunal assemblage. The depositional environment of the Angeac-Charente was likely a tropical or subtropical floodplain combined with a poorly-oxygenated swamp, with a flora dominated by cheirolepidiacean conifers. Most of the vertebrate fauna of the locality appear to have inhabited and been preserved in the swamp, making it among the few swamp bonebeds[48] The most well-known dinosaur fossils from the Angeac-Charente are an indeterminate basal ornithomimosaur, whose fossils are known in great numbers.[49][50] Other theropod clades are represented by teeth, including large teeth which have been tentatively assigned to megalosaurids. Remains of a dacentrurine stegosaurian, similar to Dacentrurus, are also known. Some ornithischians are known, including camptosaurs, hypsilophodontids, an indeterminate ankylosaur, and Echinodon sp. Two indeterminate pterodactyloid pterosaurs have been identified.[50]

Predation

[edit]

Neovenator was likely similar to other allosauroids in terms of feeding and hunting behaviour, likely targetting smaller species (or juveniles of larger species). There is evidence in the form of bite marks that Neovenator likely preyed on Mantellisaurus.[51]

Taphonomy

[edit]

The holotype of Neovenator was recovered from a plant debris bed, underlain by sandstone and mudstone, and overlain by further mudstone. Its remains were found in association with multiple fossil logs, bivalves of the family Unionidae,[1] and a partial skeleton of the iguanodontid Brighstoneus.[1][4] Despite being discovered close to one another, it is likely that the two specimens were swept together by one of two sedimentary pulses (one indicative of a small flood, the other indicative of a far larger flood) which formed the locality.[1][7]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab Brusatte, S.L.; Benson, R.B.J.; Hutt (2008). "The osteology of Neovenator salerii (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Wealden Group (Barremian) of the Isle of Wight". Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society. 162 (631): 166. Bibcode:2008MPalS.162....1B. doi:10.1080/25761900.2008.12452864.
  2. ^ a b c d e Hutt, S.; Martill, D.M.; Barker, M.J. (1996). "The first European allosauroid dinosaur (Lower Cretaceous, Wealden Group, England)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Monatshefte. 1996 (10): 635–644. doi:10.1127/njgpm/1996/1996/635.
  3. ^ a b Sweetman, Steven; Gardner, James (2013-06-01). "A new albanerpetontid amphibian from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 58 (2): 295–324. doi:10.4202/app.2011.0109. ISSN 0567-7920.
  4. ^ a b c Lockwood, Jeremy A. F.; Martill, David M.; Maidment, Susannah C. R. (2021-11-10). "A new hadrosauriform dinosaur from the Wessex Formation, Wealden Group (Early Cretaceous), of the Isle of Wight, southern England". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (12): 847–888. Bibcode:2021JSPal..19..847L. doi:10.1080/14772019.2021.1978005. ISSN 1477-2019. S2CID 244067410.
  5. ^ "Neovenator salerii". Dinosaur Isle. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  6. ^ Hutt, S.; Simmonds, K.; Hullman, G. (1990). "Predatory dinosaurs from the Isle of Wight". Proceedings of the Isle of Wight Natural History and Archaeological Society. 9: 137–146.
  7. ^ a b Hutt, S.C. 1999. Neovenator salerii: A new theropod dinosaur from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight: its status and significance for Theropod evolution. A thesis submitted for the award of degree of Master of Philosophy (unpublished). University of Portsmouth
  8. ^ a b c Néraudeau, Didier; Allain, Ronan; Ballèvre, Michel; Batten, David; Buffetaut, Eric; Colin, Jean-Paul; Dabard, Marie Pierre; Daviero-Gomez, Véronique; El Albani, Abderrazak; Gomez, Bernard; Grosheny, D; Le Loeuff, Jean; Leprince, A; Martín-Closas, Carles; Masure, Edwige; Mazin, J.-M; Philippe, Marc; Pouech, Joane; Tong, Haiyan; Vullo, Romain (2012). "The Hauterivian-Barremian lignitic bone bed of Angeac (Charente, south-west France): Stratigraphical, palaeobiological and palaeogeographical implications". Cretaceous Research. 37: 1–14. Bibcode:2012CrRes..37....1N. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2012.01.006.
  9. ^ a b Ronan Allain, Romain Vullo, Lee Rozada, Jérémy Anquetin, Renaud Bourgeais, et al.. Vertebrate paleobiodiversity of the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) Angeac-Charente Lagerstätte (southwestern France): implications for continental faunal turnover at the J/K boundary. Geodiversitas, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, In press. ffhal-03264773f
  10. ^ Paul, Gregory S. (2016). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. p. 104. ISBN 978-1-78684-190-2. OCLC 985402380.
  11. ^ a b Lockwood, Jeremy (2016). "Ichnological evidence for large predatory dinosaurs in the Wessex Formation (Wealden Group, Early Cretaceous) of the Isle of Wight". Proceedings of the Isle of Wight Natural History and Archaeological Society. 30.
  12. ^ Dodson P., Weishampel D. B. & Osmólska H., The Dinosauria, 2nd edition (2004), University of North Carolina Press, p. 104.
  13. ^ a b Naish, D., Hutt S. and Martill, D., 2001, "Saurischian dinosaurs 2: Theropods". In: Martill D. and Naish D. (eds.), Dinosaurs of the Isle of Wight The Palaeontological Association, pp. 242-309
  14. ^ Barker, C., Dyke, G., Naish, D., Newham, E. and Katsamenis, O., 2015, "Complex neurovascular network in the rostrum of Neovenator salerii", SVPCA 2015 abstracts, 78
  15. ^ a b Barker, Chris Tijani; Naish, Darren; Newham, Elis; Katsamenis, Orestis L.; Dyke, Gareth (2017). "Complex neuroanatomy in the rostrum of the Isle of Wight theropod Neovenator salerii". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 3749. Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.3749B. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03671-3. PMC 5473926. PMID 28623335.
  16. ^ a b c d e Benson, R.B.J., Carrano, M.T and Brusatte, S.L. (2010). "A new clade of archaic large-bodied predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic." Naturwissenschaften, 97:71-78 . doi:10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x
  17. ^ Holtz Jr., Thomas R. (2000). "A new phylogeny of the carnivorous dinosaurs" (PDF). Gaia: 5–61.
  18. ^ a b Brusatte, Stephen L.; and Sereno, Paul C. (2008-01-01). "Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda): Comparative analysis and resolution". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 6 (2): 155–182. doi:10.1017/S1477201907002404. ISSN 1477-2019.
  19. ^ Porfiri, J. D., Novas, F. E., Calvo, J. O., Agnolín, F. L., Ezcurra, M. D. & Cerda, I. A.; Novas; Calvo; Agnolín; Ezcurra; Cerda (2014). "Juvenile specimen of Megaraptor (Dinosauria, Theropoda) sheds light about tyrannosauroid radiation". Cretaceous Research. 51: 35–55. Bibcode:2014CrRes..51...35P. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2014.04.007. hdl:11336/12129.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Aranciaga Rolando, Alexis M.; Novas, Fernando E.; Agnolín, Federico L. (1 March 2019). "A reanalysis of Murusraptor barrosaensis Coria & Currie (2016) affords new evidence about the phylogenetical relationships of Megaraptora". Cretaceous Research. 99: 104–127. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.02.021. S2CID 134503923.
  21. ^ Naish, D.; Cau, A. (July 2022). "The osteology and affinities of Eotyrannus lengi, a tyrannosauroid theropod from the Wealden Supergroup of southern England". PeerJ. 10: e12727≠. doi:10.7717/peerj.12727. PMC 9271276. PMID 35821895.
  22. ^ a b Novas, Fernando E. (2013). "Evolution of the carnivorous dinosaurs during the Cretaceous: The evidence from Patagonia". Cretaceous Research. 45: 174–215. Bibcode:2013CrRes..45..174N. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2013.04.001. hdl:11336/102037.
  23. ^ University of Southampton. "Sensitive faces helped dinosaurs eat, woo and take temperature." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 27 June 2017
  24. ^ Benoit, Florian Bouabdellah, Emily Lessner, and Julien (2022-01-20). "The rostral neurovascular system of Tyrannosaurus rex". Palaeontologia Electronica. 25 (1): 1–20. doi:10.26879/1178. ISSN 1094-8074.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ a b c Molnar, R. E., 2001, Theropod paleopathology: a literature survey: In: Mesozoic Vertebrate Life, edited by Tanke, D. H., and Carpenter, K., Indiana University Press, p. 337-363.
  26. ^ a b c Insole, Allan N.; Hutt, Stephen (1994). "The palaeoecology of the dinosaurs of the Wessex Formation (Wealden Group, Early Cretaceous), Isle of Wight, Southern England". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 112 (1–2): 197–215. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1994.tb00318.x.
  27. ^ Marsden, Marie K.; Gunn, Joshua; Maidment, Susannah C. R.; Nichols, Gary; Wheeley, James R.; Russell, Catherine E.; Boomer, Ian; Stukins, Stephen; Butler, Richard J. (2025-01-06). "Palaeoenvironment and taphonomy of the Hypsilophodon Bed, Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation, Isle of Wight". Journal of the Geological Society. 182 (1): jgs2024–046. doi:10.1144/jgs2024-046.
  28. ^ a b c Pond, Stuart; Strachan, Sarah-Jane; Raven, Thomas J.; Simpson, Martin I.; Morgan, Kirsty; Maidment, Susannah C. R. (2023). "Vectipelta barretti , a new ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, UK". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1). doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2210577. ISSN 1477-2019.
  29. ^ a b Barker, C.T.; Hone, D.; Naish, D.; Cau, A.; Lockwood, J.; Foster, B.; Clarkin, C.; Schneider, P.; Gostling, N. (2021). "New spinosaurids from the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous, UK) and the European origins of Spinosauridae". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 19340. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1119340B. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97870-8. PMC 8481559. PMID 34588472.
  30. ^ a b c d Martill, D. M.; Hutt, S. (1996). "Possible baryonychid dinosaur teeth from the Wessex Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Barremian) of the Isle of Wight, England". Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. 107 (2): 81–84. Bibcode:1996PrGA..107...81M. doi:10.1016/S0016-7878(96)80001-0.
  31. ^ Pond, Stuart; Strachan, Sarah-Jane; Raven, Thomas J.; Simpson, Martin I.; Morgan, Kirsty; Maidment, Susannah C. R. (2023-01-01). "Vectipelta barretti, a new ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, UK". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1). Bibcode:2023JSPal..2110577P. doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2210577. ISSN 1477-2019. S2CID 259393929.
  32. ^ Lockwood, Jeremy A. F.; Martill, David M.; Maidment, Susannah C. R. (2024-12-31). "Comptonatus chasei, a new iguanodontian dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 22 (1). Bibcode:2024JSPal..2246573L. doi:10.1080/14772019.2024.2346573. ISSN 1477-2019.
  33. ^ Carpenter, K. & Ishida, Y. (2010). "Early and "Middle" Cretaceous Iguanodonts in Time and Space". Journal of Iberian Geology. 36 (2): 145–164. doi:10.5209/rev_JIGE.2010.v36.n2.3.
  34. ^ Longrich, Nicholas R.; Martill, David M.; Munt, Martin; Green, Mick; Penn, Mark; Smith, Shaun (2024-02-01). "Vectidromeus insularis, a new hypsilophodontid dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, England". Cretaceous Research. 154: 105707. Bibcode:2024CrRes.15405707L. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105707. ISSN 0195-6671.
  35. ^ a b Martill, David M.; Coram, Robert A. (2020-08-01). "Additional evidence for very large wing-span pterosaurs in the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous, Barremian) of southern England". Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. 131 (3): 293–300. Bibcode:2020PrGA..131..293M. doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2019.05.002. ISSN 0016-7878.
  36. ^ Naish, D.; Simpson, M.; Dyke, G. (2013). Farke, Andrew A (ed.). "A New Small-Bodied Azhdarchoid Pterosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of England and Its Implications for Pterosaur Anatomy, Diversity and Phylogeny". PLOS ONE. 8 (3): e58451. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...858451N. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058451. PMC 3601094. PMID 23526986.
  37. ^ Martill, David M.; Green, Mick; Smith, Roy E.; Jacobs, Megan L.; Winch, John (2020-09-01). "First tapejarid pterosaur from the Wessex Formation (Wealden Group: Lower Cretaceous, Barremian) of the United Kingdom". Cretaceous Research. 113: 104487. Bibcode:2020CrRes.11304487M. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104487. ISSN 0195-6671.
  38. ^ Sweetman, Steven; Pedreira-Segade, Ulysse; Vidovic, Steven (2014). "A new bernissartiid crocodyliform from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation (Wealden Group, Barremian) of the Isle of Wight, southern England". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi:10.4202/app.00038.2013. ISSN 0567-7920.
  39. ^ Buffetaut, Eric; Hutt, Stephen (1980-07-31). "Vectisuchus leptognathus, n. g. n. sp., a slender-snouted goniopholid crocodilian from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Monatshefte (7): 385–390. doi:10.1127/njgpm/1980/1980/385.
  40. ^ KEAR, BENJAMIN P.; BARRETT, PAUL M. (2011-03-01). "Reassessment of the Lower Cretaceous (Barremian) pliosauroid Leptocleidus superstes Andrews, 1922 and other plesiosaur remains from the nonmarine Wealden succession of southern England". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (3): 663–691. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00648.x. ISSN 0024-4082.
  41. ^ Sweetman, Steven C. (2009). "A New Species of the Plagiaulacoid Multituberculate MammalEobaatarfrom the Early Cretaceous of Southern Britain". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 54 (3): 373–384. doi:10.4202/app.2008.0003. ISSN 0567-7920.
  42. ^ Sweetman, Steven C. (2008). "A Spalacolestine Spalacotheriid (mammalia, Trechnotheria) from the Early Cretaceous (barremian) of Southern England and Its Bearing on Spalacotheriid Evolution". Palaeontology. 51 (6): 1367–1385. Bibcode:2008Palgy..51.1367S. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00816.x. ISSN 1475-4983.
  43. ^ Sweetman, Steven C.; Goedert, Jean; Martill, David M. (2014-11-01). "A preliminary account of the fishes of the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation (Wealden Group, Barremian) of the Isle of Wight, southern England". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (3): 872–896. doi:10.1111/bij.12369. ISSN 0024-4066.
  44. ^ Baranov, Viktor; Giłka, Wojciech; Zakrzewska, Marta; Jarzembowski, Edmund (2019-03-01). "New non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Lower Cretaceous Wealden amber of the Isle of Wight (UK)". Cretaceous Research. 95: 138–145. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2018.11.012. ISSN 0195-6671.
  45. ^ Perkovsky, Evgeny E.; Olmi, Massimo; Müller, Patrick; Guglielmino, Adalgisa; Jarzembowski, Edmund A.; Capradossi, Leonardo; Rasnitsyn, Alexandr P. (2021-05-01). "A review of the fossil Embolemidae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea), with description of seven new species and history of the family". Cretaceous Research. 121: 104708. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104708. ISSN 0195-6671.
  46. ^ Selden, Paul A. (2002). "First British Mesozoic Spider, From Cretaceous Amber Of The Isle Of Wight, Southern England". Palaeontology. 45 (5): 973–983. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00271. hdl:1808/8357. ISSN 1475-4983.
  47. ^ Penn, Simon J.; Sweetman, Steven C. (2023-03-01). "Microvertebrate-rich gutter casts from the basal Wessex Formation (Wealden Group, Lower Cretaceous) of Dungy Head, Dorset: Insights into the palaeoecology and palaeoenvironment of a non-marine wetland". Cretaceous Research. 143: 105397. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105397. ISSN 0195-6671.
  48. ^ Rozada, Lee; Allain, Ronan; Vullo, Romain; Goedert, Jean; Augier, Dominique; Jean, Amandine; Marchal, Jonathan; Peyre de Fabrègues, Claire; Qvarnström, Martin; Royo‐Torres, Rafael (2021). "A Lower Cretaceous Lagerstätte from France: a taphonomic overview of the Angeac‐Charente vertebrate assemblage". Lethaia. 54 (2): 141–165. doi:10.1111/let.12394. ISSN 0024-1164.
  49. ^ Pintore, Romain; Cornette, Raphaël; Houssaye, Alexandra; Allain, Ronan (2023-06-13). Ibrahim, Nizar; Rutz, Christian; Benton, Michael (eds.). "Femora from an exceptionally large population of coeval ornithomimosaurs yield evidence of sexual dimorphism in extinct theropod dinosaurs". eLife. 12: e83413. doi:10.7554/eLife.83413. ISSN 2050-084X. PMC 10264075. PMID 37309177.
  50. ^ a b Ronan Allain, Romain Vullo, Lee Rozada, Jérémy Anquetin, Renaud Bourgeais, et al.. Vertebrate paleobiodiversity of the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) Angeac-Charente Lagerstätte (southwestern France): implications for continental faunal turnover at the J/K boundary. Geodiversitas, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, In press. ffhal-03264773f
  51. ^ Barker, Chris Tijani; Naish, Darren; Newham, Elis; Katsamenis, Orestis L.; Dyke, Gareth (2017). "Complex neuroanatomy in the rostrum of the Isle of Wight theropod Neovenator salerii". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 3749. Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.3749B. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03671-3. PMC 5473926. PMID 28623335.
[edit]