Jump to content

Draft talk:Nico Cappelluti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This page has a host of problems. 1) Orchid is self-published, please add independent sources. 2) Education has no sources. 3) Current position is unsourced. 4) Research is unsourced. 5) Sources in Entrepreneur section don't prove his participation. 6) Awards are trivial, not worth including. 7) All his well cited papers are in big team publications. There is no evidence that he has by himself had WP:Impact, so notability is very unclear.

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 thanks for extra set of eyes. S0091 (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding 7 those are first author publications and he has significant number of first author publications. Large number of authors is common, yet first author is not. YCAA fellowship is one of the most competitive awards in the field of astronomy. Czfrm (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac you are knowledgeable about this field, right? Any advice for @Czfrm? S0091 (talk) 19:31, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A comment: if notability had been the only issue I would probably have just tagged this. However, 1)-5) are policy issues, WP:NPROF#General notes, so should be cured (which should not be hard). Czfrm, by resubmitting it without repairing first the basic issues and others such as the triple duplication of his Orcid, IMO you are asking for trouble. For reference, please note that we look for senior awards such as being elected as an APS Fellow, not junior awards. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]