This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
Hey, Hominid23! This company seems likely to be notable to me, but the minimum to prove that is three sources, all three of which represent
significant coverage
in a reliable source
that is independent of the subject.
The first source looked good -- significant coverage, reliable source -- until I saw it was written by the person who founded the award she was writing about and works for the company that gave that award to the company. This makes it very iffy as independent. What we'd like to see is some other reliable source covering that.
Since the first source I looked at had initially looked good, I'm wondering if you can talk a little about which three sources that you've used can meet all those qualifications? Valereee (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Valereee,
Thank you for update.
Here are the three main sources that are independent of the subject:
Following your explanation regarding the winners of a competition organised by the publication, this one only verifies it is a wholesaler based in Brighton:
As a bit of extra context, North Laine History appears to be closer to a personal blog. That being said, it is ostensibly hosting an archived version of an article from the local newspaper North Laine Runner, which is what this article is citing. That arrangement gives me pause, particularly with respect to Wikipedia's policy on self-published sources but otherwise I think the source would be good Viv Desjardin (talk) 05:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Or is the source OK to use. I'd really like to see this live. It has been a while since I created the first draft. My motivation behind this was purely that I don't trust the AI reviews and looked to Wikipedia to find out more about Infinity Foods. Happy to make changes where you see fit. Thank you Hominid23 (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally for something like this you'd want to find the original, even if that means trying to find an archived copy in the library. For something like this it'd probably require being physically in Brighton. It's not like Wikipedia doesn't accept online archives of newspaper articles, though, it's just that this archive seems to be wholly maintained by a single person.
If you want a second opinion you could just cite the newspaper and link the archived copy you found, and see what the reviewer makes of it when you next submit this draft for review.
I found this source [1] which you could incorporate into the article. Trying to write articles for small projects like this is honest work but finding good sources can be challenging... Viv Desjardin (talk, contrib) 14:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your help with this post.
Here is how the sentence looks now:
In 1971, Peter Deadman, Jenny Deadman and Robin Bines, opened Infinity Foods, a small retail shop located in a converted terraced house on Church Street, Brighton. [4]
I suggest you try and find it. If you're in the UK you've got a decent shot. If not it might not be worthwhile. If you want to be very thorough you could try reaching out to the publisher directly, tell them what you're trying to do, and they might help you out. That can be a bit of a long shot though, so hard to say
To cite a print resource it's more or less the same as an online resource. If there's no way to access it online, you can just leave off the URL part. If you're using the visual editor, there's a citation button you can click in the ribbon. The correct sub-option for this would be "Newspaper." Or, if you're using the source editor, you're going to want to take a look at Template:Cite newsViv Desjardin (talk, contrib) 16:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest you add the information from the linked article. It's pretty short and doesn't offer a lot of information but it does help to establish notability. More sources doesn't always mean the subject is more notable—notability is a very vibes based thing on Wikipedia, but having multiple, independent sources helps to build a case for why it should be included.