Draft:The Identity Trap
 | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by 2600:8800:158A:BB00:4CA8:25FC:28F:EBFE (talk | contribs) 0 seconds ago. (Update) |
| Author | Yascha Mounk |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Penguin Press |
Publication date | 2023 |
| Publication place | Germany |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 401 |
| Preceded by | The Great Experiment: Why Diverse Democracies Fall Apart and How They Can Endure |
The Identity Trap
[edit]The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time is a 2023 book by political scientist Yascha Mounk, published by Penguin Press. The book critiques the rise of identity-based politics and examines its intellectual roots, tracing the development of ideas from Postmodernism Postcolonialism, critical race theory, and intersectionality to their influence on contemporary political and cultural debates.
Background
[edit]Yascha Mounk, a scholar known for his work on democracy and liberalism, wrote The Identity Trap in response to a shift in progressive politics toward an ideology centered on identity categories such as race, gender, and sexuality. Mounk argues that this new ideology, which he terms the "identity synthesis," has diverged from traditional liberal principles of universalism and individual rights.
The book builds on Mounk’s previous work, including The People vs. Democracy (2018) and The Great Experiment (2022), where he explores the challenges facing liberal democracies. In The Identity Trap, he investigates how identity-based politics have shaped discourse in education, media, and public policy.
Summary
[edit]Mounk defines the "identity synthesis" as a set of ideas that prioritize identity categories over individual agency, often advocating for policies and cultural norms that reinforce group-based distinctions. He traces the intellectual lineage of this synthesis to thinkers like Michel Foucault, Edward Said, Kimberlé Crenshaw, and Ibram X. Kendi. He argues that these ideas, initially developed in academic contexts, have increasingly influenced mainstream political and social institutions.
The book critiques the practical consequences of the identity synthesis, contending that it leads to a rigid understanding of social justice that discourages open debate and reinforces social divisions. Mounk contrasts these ideas with classical liberalism, which he argues offers a more effective framework for addressing inequality while preserving free speech and democratic norms.
Reception
[edit]The Identity Trap received a mix of praise and criticism. Supporters, including centrist and conservative commentators, praised Mounk for his defense of liberal values and for challenging what they see as an illiberal turn in progressive politics. Critics, particularly from left-leaning perspectives, argued that Mounk misrepresents the aims of identity-focused movements and underestimates the systemic nature of discrimination.
The book was reviewed in major publications such as The New York Times, The Atlantic, and The Guardian, where reviewers debated its arguments and implications for contemporary political discourse.
See Also
[edit]