Draft:Normals (design studio)
Submission declined on 4 April 2025 by CF-501 Falcon (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 26 October 2024 by Encoded (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Encoded 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 October 2024 by Sir MemeGod (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Sir MemeGod 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 September 2024 by Urban Versis 32 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Urban Versis 32 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 10 September 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Utopes 6 months ago.
| |
Comment: Still has some of the promotional text mentioned earlier, such as "aims to create tangible representation of the future to support larger innovation efforts". SirMemeGod 16:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Which are the three best sources which establish the subject's notability? Interviews are not secondary sources, please ensure the references are independent of the subject and reliable publishers. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Normals (stylized as N O R M A L S) is a Berlin-based interdisciplinary design and futures studies studio. The studio is known for its work in design fiction and speculative design, creating conceptual and practical representations of potential futures to explore innovation strategies.[1]
Normals produces a variety of outputs, including product prototypes,[2] immersive installations,[3] story-driven animations,[4] computer-generated imagery,[5] and fictional public talks.[6]
The studio’s projects have been exhibited internationally and referenced in academic and industry discussions on the role of speculative design in emerging technologies and cultural discourse.[7]
References
[edit]- ^ Balagtas, Phil (2024-06-05). Making Futures Work: Integrating Futures Thinking for Design, Innovation, and Strategy. O'Reilly Media, Inc. pp. 298–301. ISBN 978-1-0981-4886-7.
- ^ Brownlee, John (2016-02-10). "What Fashion Will Look Like When We Upload Our Brains To The Cloud". Fast Company.
- ^ "Red Dot Design Award: Molecular Futures". Red Dot.
- ^ "Behind the Scenes of the Artefact INWARDS". Futures Garden.
- ^ "Drive to Zero 2024 - Exposition artistique". Drive to Zero.
- ^ re:publica (2018-05-06). re:publica 2018 – Rajesh Laghari: Participative Cryptoeconomics — The Future Of Universal Income. Retrieved 2024-09-10 – via YouTube.
- ^ Scholz, Alexander (2018-10-11). "The fantastical futures of studio N O R M A L S and what we can learn from them". Friends of Friends.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.