Draft:Confidence in academic writing
Submission declined on 17 June 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 16 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by Theroadislong 42 days ago. | ![]() |
![]() | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 4 days ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? or |
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Confidence in academic writing refers to writers' perceptions of their ability to create effective academic texts. This confidence is influenced by several factors, including self-efficacy, emotional experiences, feedback, prior experiences, learning styles, and personality traits influence this confidence.[1] These factors are often considered in educational contexts where the aim is to support student writing performance and increase students' well-being.
Self-Perception and Beliefs
[edit]Research suggests that beliefs about writing ability play a significant role in academic writing performance, particularly among postgraduates. In 2021, Karin Zotzmann argued that postgraduate students' confidence in writing was shaped not only by their prior experience but also by their beliefs about what constitutes good academic writing and how well they could meet those expectations.[1] The study highlighted the dynamic nature of confidence, which develops through ongoing writing experiences in relation to identity and disciplinary norms.[1]
Personality and Individual Differences
[edit]Personality traits have been associated with differences in how students approach writing and respond to instruction. Academics George Jensen and John DiTberio explored the impact of personality types on writing instruction, reporting that students' individual preferences affect their writing processes and how they interpret teacher feedback.[2] For example, they claimed that intuitive types may focus more on abstract ideas, whereas sensing types may prefer concrete instructions. These findings have been linked to variations in students' writing confidence and their perceptions of competence.[2]
Learning Styles and Instructional Alignment
[edit]Alignment between instructional strategies and students' preferred learning styles can improve writing confidence, particularly among developmental writers.[3] Linda Houston argued that instructors can align their teaching strategies with students' preferred learning modes to help students feel understood and capable, potentially encouraging a more positive and proactive approach to academic writing tasks.[3]
Emotional Dimensions and Feedback
[edit]Academic writing is not only a cognitive task but also an emotional experience. Emotional barriers, such as fear of criticism or feelings of shame, can significantly undermine writing confidence. Geoffrey Mills argues that feedback sessions, particularly those involving criticism, often trigger feelings of vulnerability and anxiety in student writers.[4]
Theoretical Framework: Self-Efficacy
[edit]Albert Bandura's "self-efficacy" theory[5] provides a solid framework for understanding confidence in academic writing. Self-efficacy refers to an individual's belief in their ability to execute specific tasks successfully. Students with high self-efficacy are more likely to persist through challenges, respond constructively to feedback, and achieve better writing outcomes. Bandura's theory suggests that individuals build confidence through experiences, modeling, and positive reinforcement.[5]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Zotzmann, Karin; Sheldrake, Richard (2021). "Postgraduate students' beliefs about and confidence for academic writing in the field of applied linguistics". Journal of Second Language Writing. 52 100810. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100810.
- ^ a b Troyka, Lynn Quitman; Jensen, George H.; DiTiberio, John K. (1991). "Personality and the Teaching of Composition". College Composition and Communication. 42 (2): 248. doi:10.2307/358208. JSTOR 358208.
- ^ a b Houston, Linda (1997). "Knowing Learning Styles Can Improve Self-Confidence of Developmental Writers". Teaching English in the Two-Year College. 24 (3): 212–215. doi:10.58680/tetyc19973826. ISSN 0098-6291.
- ^ Mills, G. (2011). Preparing for emotional sessions. Writing Lab Newsletter, 35(5–6)
- ^ a b Bandura, Albert (1977). "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change". Psychological Review. 84 (2): 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. ISSN 0033-295X. PMID 847061.