Draft:Armenian-Byzantine Wars
![]() | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by StarTrekker (talk | contribs) 5 days ago. (Update) |
The Armenian-Byzantine wars [note 1] were conflicts between Armenian kingdoms (Bagratid Armenia, Cilician Armenia etc.) and Byzantine Empire during Middle Ages. The result is indecisive, but both sides had some victories: Byzantine annexed most of Armenian kingdoms in Armenian highlands, which late conquered by seljuks and Armenians established Kingdom in Cilicia.
Armenian-Byzantine wars | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of Medieval warfare | |||||||
![]() Armenian military commander and sparapet Vahram Pahlavouni (in the center) | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Iberia | Byzantine Empire | ||||||
Byzantine Empire Supported by Principality of Antioch | |||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Gagik I Gagik II (POW) Vahram Pahlavouni Ruben I Constantine I Thoros I Leo I (POW) Thoros II (WIA) Mleh Stephen |
Basil II Constantine IX Alexios I John II † Manuel I Alexios II Raynald of Chatillon Andronikos I ![]() | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
Unknown | 20000 killed only at Battle of Ani |
Background
[edit]The relationship between the Byzantine Empire and ancient Armenia was a constant and varied one with an equal mix of wars, occupations, treaties of friendship, mutual military aid, and cultural exchange. Regarded as a vital defence to the Empire's eastern frontiers, emperors used various means of influence from outright takeover to gifts of titles and lands to Armenian nobles. Influence went in the other direction, too, with several important Byzantine emperors being of Armenian descent, as well as many individuals who held key military and administrative positions in Constantinople and beyond.[1]
Byzantine emperor Constantine V (r. 741-775 CE) attacked Armenia between 746 and 752 CE, taking advantage of the civil war which preoccupied the Umayyad Caliphate. The Byzantine Empire would assert even more influence over Armenia from the 10th century CE.[1]
War in Armenia (966–1045)
[edit]Conquest of Taron
[edit]The lines of the Bagratunis had established their rule in Taron. This power, as mentioned, became the first victim of Byzantine. It was captured by the Byzantines in 966.
Conquest of Tayk
[edit]In the northwestern part of Armenia, the Tayk principality emerged. Byzantium declared it independent, and its ruler David was declared a vassal. David, before his death (1000), bequeathed Tayk to Byzantium. Thus, Tayk passed to Byzantium after David's death.
Battle of Ani
[edit]
Constantine IX Monomachos sents army about 100 000 for surrender Ani to Byzantine. 30 000 armenians of Ani led by Vahram Pahlavouni defended Ani and expuled them. Byzantine Army returned with heavy causalties, about 20 000 dead.
Fall of Ani
[edit]In 1045, Byzantine emperor Constantine IX Monomachos was notified that Gagik II tried to strengthen country, calls him to Constantinople, to talk about Ani's problem. Gagik arrives to the capital of Byzantine, but where turns out that Constantine conspired. Gagik II is trapped in the Byzantine court, after which a series of raids are undertaken against Ani, resulting in the decline of the Bagratid Kingdom of Ani.
Armenians in Cilicia
[edit]Cilicia, located adjacent to the Armenian Highlands, has been known to Armenians since ancient times. As early as the 1st century BC, Tigranes II conquered and annexed the eastern plains and mountains of Cilicia to the Armenian state. It is likely that Armenians began to settle in Cilicia from that time on. By the 10th century, they were already in considerable numbers.
To address the national and ecclesiastical problems of the Armenians of Cilicia, Catholicos Khachig I founded a number of episcopal dioceses at the end of the 10th century.
In the 11th century, Due to the unfavorable situation created for Armenia, the mass emigration of the Armenian population to Lesser Armenia, Cappadocia, Assyria and Cilicia begins. It was associated with the policy of Byzantine to emigrate Armenians from Armenia and the raids of the Seljuk Turks. The raids of the nomadic Seljuk Turks had such severe consequences that significant parts of the Armenian population were forced to leave their homeland. Some of them settled in Cilicia. In the 11th century, the Byzantines also moved a number of royal and princely houses from Armenia to Cappadocia and Cilicia, along with their subject population. The Artsrunis and Bagratunis were also forced to emigrate from Armenia.
Cilician wars
[edit]Background
[edit]
Some of the Armenian princes who settled in Cappadocia, Cilicia and Northern Syria received from the empire the administration of one or another province in exchange for military service. Among them was Aplgharip Artsruni, whom the Byzantine court had appointed governor (strategos) of Cilicia. The cities of Adana, Mamistra, Tarsus and the fortresses of Lambron and Paperon were given to him. Later, Prince Aplgharip donated Lambron to Prince Oshin, who had moved from Gandzak to Cilicia, from whom the Hetumyan princely and then royal house descended.
The last Bagratid ruler of Ani, Gagik II, had settled in the city of Pizu, located on the border of Cilicia. The last king of Kars, Gagik Abbasyan, had established his rule in the regions of Lesser Armenia and Cappadocia bordering Cilicia.
The presence of a large Armenian population, the Armenian Church and Armenian royal and princely houses in Cilicia created the prerequisites for the creation of Armenian statehood.
War over Mountainous Cilicia
[edit]One of the Armenian princes, Ruben, founded the Rubenid principality in Mountainous Cilicia in 1080. Relying on the support of the Armenian population, Ruben was able to capture part of Mountainous Cilicia from the Byzantines.
The existence of the Rubinian principality was threatened not only by the Byzantines, but also by the Seljuk Turks. However, the First Crusade, which began to liberate Palestine and Syria from the Muslims, temporarily diverted their attention from Cilicia, allowing the Armenian authority to consolidate and strengthen.
Capture of Vahka
[edit]Ruben was succeeded by his son Constantine, during whose reign the Rubenids' rule expanded and strengthened. In 1098 he captured the famous fortress of Vahka in Mountainous Cilicia from the Byzantines, which became the center of power.
Part of the Crusaders were to pass through Cilicia, and Constantine controlled the Taurus passes, so they had to negotiate with him. The Armenian prince allowed the Crusaders to pass through the Taurus passes and supplied them with food. In return, the Crusaders granted him the title of baron.
The Crusaders captured the famous cities of Plain Cilicia, Tarsus, Adana and Mamistra, from the Seljuks, for which a stubborn struggle began between the Armenians, the Byzantines, the Seljuks and the Crusaders. The Crusaders also captured Syria and Palestine and created four Crusader states: the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the Principality of Antioch, the counties of Edessa and Tripoli.
Capture of Anazarbus and Sis
[edit]In 1107,[2] encouraged by Tancred, Prince of Antioch, Thoros followed the course of the Pyramus River (today the river Ceyhan in Turkey), and seized the strongholds of Anazarbus (a place which had been considered impregnable) and Sis (ancient city).[3] Toros extensively rebuilt the fortifications at both fortresses with tall circuit walls and massive round towers.
Byzantine conquest of Cilicia (1137)
[edit]Byzantium could not come to terms with the loss of Cilicia, so John Komnenos entered Cilicia Plain with a large army in the spring of 1137. Taking advantage of the numerical superiority, the Byzantines captured Tarsus, Adana, and Msis, and after a 37-day siege, Anabarza. Levon fortified himself with a small force in the fortress of Vahka, which fell after a heroic six-month defense. Eventually, John invited Leo to a meeting under a false promise of peace, where the prince was captured. Leo and two of his sons, Roupen and Thoros, were subsequently taken prisoner.Rubinian rule in Cilicia temporarily collapsed.
Struggle of Thoros II
[edit]The captured Levon and his son Ruben died in prison. The other son of the Armenian prince, Toros, fled and, upon returning, led the liberation struggle of the Armenians of Cilicia. He was joined by his two brothers, Stepane and Mleh, who had escaped captivity.
Toros II began a struggle against the Byzantines with a small army. Within a few years, he liberated Vahka, Anabarza, Msis, and Tarson. Thus, the Armenians again managed to establish their power over most of Cilicia and restore the Rubinian rule. Further attempts by Byzantium to conquer Cilicia ended in failure.
Liberation of Cilician Armenia
[edit]Leo died and was elevated to Christ; the emperor then felt compassion for Thoros, took him out of prison, and received him into the imperial guards. Being now in the imperial palace, and a soldier among the soldiers, he very soon distinguished himself, and even the emperor looked upon him with benevolence. Before the end of the year /1141/ the emperor left Constantinople with a large army, and went to assist the Prince of Antioch, who was hard pressed by the Turks. Being on a hunting party in the valley of Anazarbus, one of his own poisoned arrows wounded him, and he fell dead on the spot; he thus met with his deserved fate (…) The Greek army returned, but Thoros remained in the country; though the traditions concerning this fact are different. Some say, Thoros withdrew himself quite alone, went by sea from Antioch to Cilicia, and took possession of his dominions, finding means to gain at first the town of Amouda, and afterwards all the other places. But the emperor’s party say that Thoros, during the time the Greeks stayed in the country, lived with a lady who gave him a great sum of money; with these treasures he fled to the mountains, and discovered himself to a priest as the son of Leo, the true king of the country. The priest was exceedingly happy at these tidings, and Thoros hid himself under a shepherd’s disguise. There were many Armenians in this part of the country who, being barbarously treated by the Greeks, sighed for their former masters; to these men, as it is said, the priest imparted the joyful tidings; they instantly assembled and appointed Thoros their Baron; he gained possession of Vahka, and afterwards of many other places. Let this be as it may, it was certainly ordained by God that this man, who was carried away as a prisoner, should become the chief of the country of his forefathers, that he should take the government out of the hands of the Greeks, and destroy their armies.
— Vahram of Edessa: The Rhymed Chronicle of Armenia Minor[4]
Battle of Mamistra
[edit]In the same year /1151/ Leo's son, Thoros, took Mamistra and Tel Hamdoun from the Romans and seized Duke Thomas. Duke Andronicus who was charged with protecting the land of the Cilicians by order of the Roman emperor, came to the city of Mamistra with 12,000 cavalry against Thoros. And he boasted, shouting out to Thoros: «Behold your father's iron chains. I will take you bound in them to Constantinople, like your father.» When valiant Thoros heard this, he was unable to bear the insult. Instead, placing his trust in God, he assembled his forces, breached Mamistra’s walls at night, and attacked /the Byzantine troops/ like a lion, putting them to the sword. Among those who died in the great battle before the city gates was Sempad, lord of Barbaron. Among those captured were the lord of Lampron, Oshin, the lord of Partzepert, Vasil, and the lord of Prakan, Tigran /all of whom were/ on the side of the emperor. /Thoros'/ troops seized and despoiled the weak Roman forces and then let them go.
— Smbat Sparapet: Chronicle[5]
Byzantine's treacherous move
[edit]In the year 603 AE /1154/ once again the Byzantine emperor Manuel sought to stoke Masud and he sent him twice the amount of treasure as previously, saying: «Quench the burning of my heart toward the Armenian people, destroy their fortresses, and exterminate them.» So the sultan came to Anazarbus with many troops, but he was unable to accomplish anything. He sent one of his grandees, named Yaqub, to ravage the territory of Antioch. When they had crossed the gate, the Brothers /the Knights Templar/, as though sent by God, swooped upon them at that place and slaughtered all of them, including their chief. When those in the sultan’s army heard about this, they were horrified. This was not all, for the wrath of God was visited upon them. Their horses perished from tapax /diarrhea/ and they themselves turned to flight, brother not waiting to help brother, nor comrade, comrade. They hamstrung many of the horses and fled on foot through difficult, marshy places, as though they were persecuting themselves. For at that time Thoros was not in his country. Rather, he had gone to Tsets. When he returned and saw what had unfolded everyone thanked God, for they had been defeated without the use of weapons and without a physical battle.
— Smbat Sparapet: Chronicle[5]
Other view is that after the battle Raynald was forced to return home, covered with humiliation; and later on, Thoros voluntarily surrendered to the brethren the fortresses in question, and the Knights in turn took oath "to assist the Armenians on all occasions where they needed help."[6]
The Armenians attacked the few remaining Byzantine fortresses in Cilicia.[2]
Battle of Tarsus (1165)
[edit]The 15,000-strong Byzantine troops transferred here from Cyprus approach the city in battle formation, facing the troops of the Armenian government of Cilicia led by Toros II (about 10,000 strong). According to John Kinnamos's "Brief History", before the left attack, his army, by order of Andronikos, adopts a wedge-shaped formation typical of the Crusader orders. The Armenian side manages to bypass the Byzantine garrisons unnoticed and inflict a heavy defeat on the latter with unexpected flank attacks. Developing tactical successes, Toros II's troops pursue the Byzantines and completely destroy the retreating enemy garrisons.
There are conflicting opinions regarding the use of the "pig's head" formation by the Byzantines. Niketas Choniates, in his work "History", supplementing the idea of Hovhannes Kinamos, notes that by this step the Byzantines were showing a contemptuous attitude towards the Cilician Armenian statehood. The primary source information that has reached us confirms that after the defeat, the mounted Andronicus, who had lost his troops, approached Toros unnoticed, then knocked the latter off his horse with a surprise attack. Having struck the Armenian prince from the back, Andronikos fled, leaving Thoros lying on the ground. However, thanks to his reliable armor and long shield, the Rubinian prince did not suffer any significant damage.
Destruction of the last Byzantine strongholds
[edit]Toros II was succeeded by his brother Mleh (1169-1175). At the beginning of Mleh's rule, several eastern regions of Plain Cilicia were still in the hands of the Crusaders, and some western provinces were in the hands of Byzantium. In order to defend and further strengthen the country, it was necessary to liberate all the coastal regions from the Byzantines and the Crusaders. To implement this difficult task, Mleh, pursuing a new policy, allied himself with the Muslim emir of Aleppo. In this way, Mleh took back the most important fortresses in eastern Cilicia from the Crusaders, and then liberated Adana, Msis, and Tarsus, along with their coastal regions, from Byzantium. Armenian rule established its control over important trade routes. Mleh also tried to annex the Lambron fortress belonging to the Hetumids to his rule, but did not succeed. Prince Mleh improved the city of Sis and made it the capital of Cilician Armenia. His policies and reforms greatly contributed to the rise and strengthening of Cilician Armenia. However, the high-ranking clergy and princes, dissatisfied with Mleh's policies, organized a conspiracy and killed him.
Mleh was succeeded by Ruben, the son of his brother Stepane. Taking advantage of the hostility of Byzantium and the Sultanate of Iconium, Ruben captured the western regions of Cilicia, thanks to which the last strongholds of Byzantine rule in Cilicia were eliminated. The successes of Mleh and Ruben put an end to Byzantine ambitions over Cilicia.
Aftermath
[edit]The Armenian state of Cilicia created a standing army of 30,000. The authority of Thoros II greatly increased. One of his important undertakings was to move the Armenian Catholicosate to the fortress city of Rumkale, where it remained until Mamluk capture in 1292.
Thus, after more than a century of heroic and bloody struggle, the Armenians who settled in Cilicia created and strengthened the Armenian principality, preparing the ground for the latter to be proclaimed a kingdom.
After losing Cilicia, Byxantine Empire and Cilician Armenia had no special relationship for long time. Relations resumed in the 14th century, along with the weakening of Cilician Armenia.
Notes
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Cartwright, Mark. "Byzantine-Armenian Relations". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2025-03-24.
- ^ a b Ghazarian, Jacob G. The Armenian Kingdom in Cilicia during the Crusades: The Integration of Cilician Armenians with the Latins (1080–1093).
- ^ Kurkjian 1958, p. 219
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ Vahram (2008-09-10). "Chronicle". Text Archive. Internet Archive. Retrieved 2009-07-20.
- ^ a b Smbat Sparapet (Sempad the Constable) (2005). "Chronicle". History Workshop: Armenian Historical Sources of the 5th–15th Centuries (Selected Works). Robert Bedrosian's Homepage. Retrieved 2009-07-20.
- ^ Kurkjian 1958, p. 225