Diagnostic Enterprise Method
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The Diagnostic Enterprise Method (DEM) constitutes a framework of guiding principles of human resources management theory derived from Frederick Winslow Taylor's (1856–1915) principles. They outline strategies and methodologies intended to enable organizations to restructure their internal work processes autonomously, particularly when integrating emerging technologies.[citation needed]
Background
[edit]Often considered a pioneer in scientific management,[1] Taylor developed his methods through various experiments. One such experiment involved measuring the time it took for a machine to produce an object.[citation needed] This began when enterprise economy and efficiency were substandard, with the goal of better allocating workers within these time frames.[citation needed]
Taylor later established four principles to increase workplace efficiency, which became the framework for further management theorizing. These principles include:
- Analyzing the way each worker performs their assigned task to improvise a new plan of activities.
- Converting new methods into written rules to be used as standards for working.
- Selecting workers who have the necessary abilities and can be trained to follow the standard rules.
- Creating common goals between workers and establishing a pay system that rewards individuals who exceed their assigned responsibilities.[2]
Derivatives of Taylor's method
[edit]Systematic method
[edit]Labor analysis builds upon the techniques of Taylor, with a focus on the development of a job position. Managers should identify and understand their workers to improve their abilities within the enterprise.[3]
The short facts method begins with a case study, typically no longer than four paragraphs, describing a simple problem. The case is then analyzed by a group of employees and managers within the enterprise, followed by a discussion to identify potential solutions.[4]
The strategic analysis method is based on the thinking of subsystems.[5] In this method, managers decide on the desired accomplishments for the enterprise, including establishing guidelines. Subsequently, specific, measurable goals are created for the enterprise. Finally, managers develop a strategic plan based on the preceding steps.[6]
Harvard's method
[edit]The Harvard method was developed by the Harvard Business School and is used in its Management Business Academy course. Enterprises create their case studies using information from their company, ensuring that every employee can understand the problems.[7]
The MIT method is influenced by the Harvard method but is adapted for engineers. Participants are required to prepare an analysis and a potential solution prior to the session, to compare with the group's findings. At the end of the session, the instructor shares the 'nearest correct solution' and the intended solution. The participants then conduct individual research on the case study after the group session.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ Drury 1918, pp. 15–21, 292
- ^ Hernandez y Rodriguez (September 1994). Introducción a la Administración [Management Introduction] (in Spanish). Vol. 1. México: McGraw Hill. pp. 67–70.
- ^ Mendez, Juan Nieto (March 1974). Las Artes de la Alta Dirección [The art of High Management] (in Spanish). Vol. 1. México: McGraw Hill. pp. 94–105.
- ^ a b Jones, Gareth (2010). "[Taking decisions learning, creativity, and entrepreneur spirit]". Administración Contemporanea [Contemporary Management] (in Spanish). Vol. 6. México: McGraw Hill. pp. 236–240.
- ^ Contreras J. (2010). "Estrategia Empresarial" [Enterprise Strategy] (in Spanish). Retrieved October 15, 2010.[dead link]
- ^ Mondy, Wayne (March 1991). "[The Planning Process]". In Peters, Jack (ed.). Management concepts, practices, and skills [Administracion conceptos, practicas y habilidades]. Vol. 5. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. pp. 134–195.
- ^ Eagan L. (1997). "The HBS Case in Action". Retrieved October 15, 2010.
Sources
[edit]- Drury, Horace Bookwalter (1918). "Scientific Management; A History and Criticism". Studies in History, Economics and Public Law (this is a re-print of Drury's 1915 PhD dissertation at Columbia). 65 (1, whole no. 157). Edited by the Faculty of Political Science of Columbia University: 100 – via Internet Archive (Cornell University Library)
.
