Jump to content

Demotic Egyptian language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Demotiс Egyptian
Demotic
𐦲𐧒‎
Pronunciation[xɛm]
Native toAncient Egypt: New Kingdom of Egypt, Third Intermediate Period
Datec. 700 BC
RegionNorth Africa
EthnicityAncient Egyptians
Extinctc. 115 AD
Afroasiatic
Early forms
Demotic script
Official status
Official language in
Roman Egypt
Language codes
ISO 639-2egy
ISO 639-3egy – inclusive code
Individual code:
cop – Greek Demotic
Glottologdemo1234  Demotic Egyptian

Demotiс Egyptian language was the state of the Egyptian language from the seventh century BC to the fifth century AD.[1][2] The formation and development of the Demotic language as a separate language from the New Egyptian was strongly influenced by Aramaic and Ancient Greek.[3]

History and periods

[edit]

As a stage in the continuing evolution of the Egyptian language that would eventually pass into the Coptic language, Bresciani (1986) divides the history of the Demotic language (as well as its script) into three periods:[1]

  1. Old Demotic, used during the 28th-30th dynasties,
  2. Ptolemaic Demotic, used during Ptolemaic rule, and
  3. Roman Demotic, during the period of Roman rule in Egypt.[4]

Roman Demotic in particular exhibits a number of grammatical innovations that distinguishes it from earlier forms of Demotic, such as:

  • the attestation of suffix pronouns on definite articles used alone without a following noun,[5]
  • the loss of distinctions in personal endings used with the qualitative verb forms,[6]
  • the innovation of the Future I verb tense form in the pattern tw-j nꜣ stm,[7]
  • the expansion of certain periphrastic verbal constructions from use with specific verbs to general use with all verbs, as with the Positive Aorist ir-f sdm,[8] or the Optative mj ir-f stm,[9] and
  • the generalized use of the preposition n with nouns that serve as the direct complement of verbs.[10]

Phonology

[edit]

Like earlier phases of the Egyptian language, Demotic was written with a consonant-based script. These consonant-based graphemes form the basis for the reconstructions of Demotic consonants, as presented in the table below.

Demotic consonant phonemes[11]
Labial Alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyngeal Glottal
Nasal m n
Plosive p b t d k g q ʔ
fricative f s ʃ x ħ ʕ h
Approximant r l j w

Grammar

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

Demotic had definite and indefinite articles that exhibited a three-way distinction between gender and number.[12]

Demotic Articles[12]
Singular Plural
Masculine Feminine
Definite pꜣ tꜣ nꜣ
Indefinite wꜥ wꜥ.t hyn.w

Some examples:[12]

pꜣ

the.M

rꜥ

Sun.god

pꜣ rꜥ

the.M Sun.god

'the Sun-god'

tꜣ

the.F

mj.t

road-F

tꜣ mj.t

the.F road-F

'the road'

In some specific cases, definite nouns could appear with no article, such as in expressions of time, or with body part nouns in a direct genitive construction:[13]

n

at

grḥ

night

n grḥ

at night

'at night'

jrṱ=f

eye=3SG

jrṱ=f

eye=3SG

'his eye'

Possessives

[edit]

The definite article could also combine with y and a suffix pronoun to form possessives, which could be followed by a noun or appear alone. Some examples:[14]

tꜣy=y

the.F=1SG

mw.t

mother-F

tꜣy=y mw.t

the.F=1SG mother-F

'my mother'

nꜣy=f

the.PL=3SG.M

sn.w

brother-PL

nꜣy=f sn.w

the.PL=3SG.M brother-PL

'his brothers'

pꜣy=s

the.M=3SG.F

pꜣy=s

the.M=3SG.F

'her own'

Pronouns

[edit]

As with earlier periods of Egyptian, Demotic had a set of independent pronouns and another of dependent pronouns.

Independent pronouns in Demotic served in nominal sentences and cleft sentences, and had distinctions for person, number, and gender.[15]

Demotic Independent Pronouns[15]
Singular Plural
Masculine Feminine
1st person jnk jnn
2nd person mtwk mtwt mtwtn
3rd person mtwf mtws mtww

Dependent pronouns in Demotic served as pronominal direct objects following imperatives or conjugated verbs.[16]

Demotic Independent Pronouns[15]
Singular Plural
Masculine Feminine
1st person ṱ=y ṱ=n
2nd person ṱ=k ṱ=t ṱ=tn
3rd person s s st

Demotic also had a set of interrogative pronouns, including jh̭ and nm, both of which meant 'who?' or 'what?'.[17]

Prepositions

[edit]

Demotic had two types of simple prepositions: those that maintained a single form in all environments, and those that changed form if followed by a pronominal object. Those that had a single form included jrm 'with, and', jwṱ 'between', jwty 'without', ẖn 'in', and ḥr 'over, upon'.[18] Prepositions that changed form did so as in the table below.

Demotic prepositions with special forms[19]
'to, for' 'in' 'to(ward)' 'under'
Before a noun n n r ẖr
1st person singular n=y n-jm=y r-ḥr=y ẖr-r-ḥr=y
plural n=n n-jm=n r-ḥr=n
2nd person singular masculine n=k n-jm=k r-jr=k ẖr-r(-jr)=k
feminine n=t n-jm=t r-ḥr=t
plural n=tn n-jm=tn r-ḥr=tn
3rd person singular masculine n=f n-jm=f r-r=f ẖr-(r-)r=f
feminine n=s n-jm=s r-r=s ẖr-r-r=s
plural n=w n-jm=w r-r=w ẖr-r=w

Some examples of simple prepositions with nouns:[20]

n

in

ḥꜣṱ=k

heart=2SG

n ḥꜣṱ=k

in heart=2SG

'in your heart'

n

to

pꜣy=f

the.M=3SG

ḥry

superior

n pꜣy=f ḥry

to the.M=3SG superior

'to its superior'

Particles

[edit]

Demotic possessed a system of particles that worked with verbs and clauses in various functions. A table of some of these with their functions appears below.

Demotic particles
Form Function
j vocative[21]
jn interrogative[22]
jn-nꜣ conditional[23][24]
bw negative[25][26]
bn negative[27][26]
my hortative[28]
hwn-nꜣw irrealis[29][30]
hmy "would that!",[29][31] "if"[29]
ḫr aorist[8]
ḏd purpose[32]

A special group of particles, termed "sentence markers" or "converters", could appear at the beginning of a clause to modify the clause's function or meaning.[33] These included the circumstantial converter jw, the relative converter nt, the second tense converter jjr, and the imperfect converter wn-nꜣw.[34]

Adverbs

[edit]

Adverbs in Demotic included adverbs of quality, place, and time. Adverbs composed of a single word include tj 'here', tn 'where', and rstj 'tomorrow'. Multiword adverbial expressions included r bnr 'outside', r ẖn 'inside', n sf 'yesterday', n grḥ 'at night', and r šw 'never'.[35]

Monuments

[edit]

Among the monuments of a new daily language literature, comparing to the previous stages of the Egyptian language comes fairy genre, a fable. These fables were intimately entwined with the mythology and narrated the adventures of the mythological characters of the Egyptian religion. Leiden papyrus, dating from the I-II centuries BC, contains such fables.[36]

Notes

[edit]
1. ^ This same tripartite historical division is likewise adopted by Johnson (1976), where she adopts the term "Saite and Persian" for Bresciani's "Old Demotic", which Bresciani considers to encompass Saitic, Persian, and Demotic paleographic types.[37][38]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Loprieno 1995, p. 7.
  2. ^ Allen 2013, p. 3.
  3. ^ "Демотический язык" (PDF) (in Russian). Egyptology.Ru. Retrieved 2015-03-16.
  4. ^ Bresciani 1986, pp. 19–20.
  5. ^ Bresciani 1986, p. 37.
  6. ^ Bresciani 1986, p. 59.
  7. ^ Bresciani 1986, p. 69.
  8. ^ a b Johnson 1976, p. 87.
  9. ^ Bresciani 1986, p. 74.
  10. ^ Bresciani 1986, p. 84.
  11. ^ Allen 2013, pp. 53–54.
  12. ^ a b c Johnson 2000, p. 12.
  13. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 13.
  14. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 49.
  15. ^ a b c Johnson 2000, p. 14.
  16. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 21, 23.
  17. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 15.
  18. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 28.
  19. ^ Johnson 2000, pp. 28–29.
  20. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 29.
  21. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 58, 99.
  22. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 47.
  23. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 160, 163.
  24. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 81.
  25. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 96.
  26. ^ a b Johnson 2000, p. 89.
  27. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 110.
  28. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 173.
  29. ^ a b c Johnson 1976, p. 172.
  30. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 83.
  31. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 62.
  32. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 106.
  33. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 61.
  34. ^ Johnson 2000, p. 61, 65, 73, 75.
  35. ^ Bresciani 1986, pp. 92–93.
  36. ^ Коростовцев. Литература демотическая. — Фундаментальная электронная библиотека. (in Russian)
  37. ^ Johnson 1976, p. 1.
  38. ^ Bresciani 1986, p. 20.

Bibliography

[edit]