Category:Mid-impact WikiProject Wikipedia essays articles
![]() | This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. |
The Wikipedia essays in this category are relatively important to Wikipedia:WikiProject Essays, as they influence opinion somewhat and/or are somewhat widely read and/or cited in discussion. Essays from 51 to 100 on the weighted score scale are considered mid importance, putting them in the top 10% of Wikipedia essays.
The weighted score system takes into account number of page watchers (W), pageviews in the previous month (P), and number of incoming links (L). As all three of these metrics are subject to change, essays may be re-rated month-over-month. The importance of essays is determined based on their rank in the list of essays sorted by score. The score is calculated with the following equation: W*10+P*2+L/100.
Pages in category "Mid-impact WikiProject Wikipedia essays articles"
The following 90 pages are in this category, out of 90 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
A
- Wikipedia talk:A nice cup of tea and a sit down
- Wikipedia talk:Academic use
- Wikipedia talk:Advanced article editing
- Wikipedia talk:Advanced source searching
- Wikipedia talk:Advice for parents
- Wikipedia talk:Advocacy
- Wikipedia talk:Alternative outlets
- Wikipedia talk:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing
- Wikipedia talk:Assume no clue
- Wikipedia talk:Autistic editors
- Wikipedia talk:Avoid instruction creep
- Wikipedia talk:Avoiding harm
C
- Wikipedia talk:Call a spade a spade
- Wikipedia talk:Cherrypicking
- Wikipedia talk:Chesterton's fence
- Wikipedia talk:Civil POV pushing
- Wikipedia talk:Coatrack articles
- Wikipedia talk:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)
- Wikipedia talk:Comprised of
- Wikipedia talk:Content removal
- Wikipedia talk:Credible claim of significance
D
- Wikipedia talk:Deny recognition
- Wikipedia talk:Don't be high-maintenance
- Wikipedia talk:Don't bludgeon the process
- Wikipedia talk:Don't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia talk:Don't delete the main page
- Wikipedia talk:Don't stuff beans up your nose/Uh-huh
- Wikipedia talk:Don't template the regulars
- Wikipedia talk:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
E
I
N
P
S
T
- Wikipedia talk:Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia
- Wikipedia talk:Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia
- Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything
- Wikipedia talk:The duck test
- Wikipedia talk:The Free Encyclopedia
- Wikipedia talk:The rules are principles
- Wikipedia talk:There is no deadline
W
- Wikipedia talk:Wall of text
- Wikipedia talk:Why Wikipedia is so great
- Wikipedia talk:WikiDragon
- Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is a community
- Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is a work in progress
- Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
- Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is failing
- Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not about winning
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect/Style guide
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia essays