Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States
Appearance
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued February 23, 1813 Decided February 26, 1813 | |
Full case name | Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States |
Citations | 11 U.S. 382 (more) |
Holding | |
Congress may revive a law by conditioning its revival on certain inaction by the President. Such is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Johnson, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3 and Non-Intercourse Act |
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 Non-Intercourse Act, a trade prohibition against Great Britain, would be reinstated the following year unless the President declared that it was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The Court unanimously rejected arguments based on the nondelegation doctrine, "reviving the act [...] neither expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct."[1]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist