Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland

Proposed deletion of Silesian Air

The article Silesian Air has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. Defunct airline for a defunct state. Not enough information to merge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Projekt TYTAN

The article Projekt TYTAN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google. Not enough information to merge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Sněžka", Śnieżka or an English exonym, if there is one ?

A discussion at Talk:Sněžka#Requested move 30 January 2025, regarding Sněžka → Śnieżka-Sněžka on the Polish—Czech border, may be of interest. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:47, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Paradisus Judaeorum#Requested move 31 January 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Paradisus Judaeorum#Requested move 31 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 18:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Miejski Stadion Piłkarski "Raków"#Requested move 30 January 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Miejski Stadion Piłkarski "Raków"#Requested move 30 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 18:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Przemysł II

Przemysł II has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

The European Destubathon

Project members are invited to participate in The European Destubathon in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes, including a prize for articles from your project, which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub, though longer expansions also welcome. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:45, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Which of those two template designs do you prefer?

Hi, recently, I have made the tempalte titled Public art in Warsaw listing monuments and sculptures in Warsaw. However, I'm not sure, which solution would be better, when in comes to former art, which was since removed. Currently, such works are marked with a symbol (†), and included with the rest of the sculptures. I copied such design from templates such as Template:Public art in Washington, D.C., and Template:Public art in Manhattan. However, I'm wondering if maybe putting them into their own category at the bottom wouldn't be better. I have made example of how it could look in this sandbox. Which design do you think would be better? Sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

@Artemis Andromeda: – I think that the template featuring the (†) symbol is appropriate enough. Thanks for your contribution! Merangs (talk) 21:00, 14 March 2025 (UTC)