Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
![]() | This is not the page for reporting vandalism. The page to report persistent vandalism is at Administrator intervention against vandalism. |
This is the talk page for discussing Administrator intervention against vandalism and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 14 days ![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
AIV helperbot information HBC AIV helperbot14 assists with the management of vandalism reports. Edit the following parameters in the page header to control the bot's behavior:
|
Could the bot section be collapsed?
[edit]It's taking too long to scroll past it to go to the user section, and it's usually the larger of the two due to DatBot's reports, so wouldn't it be useful if, say, {{hidden}} was used? Not sure if bots could go through it and still leave posts, though, as sometimes there's conflicts... ~Lofty abyss 12:53, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- This would be cool. I'll ping @DatGuy here since they maintain DatBot and may know whether it would break if we wrapped the content of the bot section in {{hidden begin}} {{hidden end}}. —tony 14:48, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- I just realized the bot section is transcluded from WP:AIV/TB2, so hiding the whole section with {{hidden}} or {{hidden begin}} {{hidden end}} would not affect the bot's ability to leave reports since it doesn't do it directly on that page (unless I'm missing something). —tony 15:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think it should be. If a report is already there someone should be able to see it and not make a redundant report. — xaosflux Talk 15:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- They'd presumably be able to see it by expanding the section. Currently, it's not easy to spot one line out of many, still, and sometimes people seem to report again even if it's the same as the last line, as it's done through TW, and, I think, although not sure about, that it doesn't seem to automatically check for duplicates. ~Lofty abyss 22:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Was pinged here but I'd also like to note my opposition on the same lines as xaosflux and that administrators go to WP:AIV and scroll through both user and bot reports. Twinkle also checks for TB2 reports. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC)