Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Metriorrhynchus rhipidius.jpg
Appearance
- Reason
- High quality macro shot - good sharpness and lighting
- Articles this image appears in
- Lycidae
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator --Fir0002 08:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support It's nice, but the antennae are blurry, and I personally find the white sports on the leaf a bit distracting. SpencerT♦C 22:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1. It's much better in focus here, though I have to admit, the background is a tad distracting. SpencerT♦C 02:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - "Blurry antennae". 8thstar 01:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Alt1 is better... 8thstar 00:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)- Support Alt1 for softer lighting, better focus. Background is interesting but not too distracting. Fletcher (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support either - top one is actually better for identification since it shows the tarsi more clearly. de Bivort 16:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt1 - Better composition, lighting, and focus. Kaldari (talk) 18:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt1 You've done it again,Fir! --Fireaxe888 (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support original Nice. I think the background of the alt 1 is pretty busy.--Caspian blue 21:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt1 I find it more interesting than the original Noodle snacks (talk) 23:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support original the background makes the subject stand our more. Cacophony (talk) 07:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support alternative Muhammad(talk) 12:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Metriorrhynchus rhipidius02.jpg MER-C 07:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)