User talk:Hide on Rosé
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
Test
[edit] Hello, I'm 176.33.244.31. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!
- @176.33.244.31 Tell me, did I make mistakses? Hide on Rosé (thảo luận | đóng góp | trung ương) 11:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. 176.33.244.31 (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2025
[edit] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Self-warning Phương Linh (thảo luận) 14:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Saukatali5200
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User talk:Saukatali5200 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: That page should be blanked. Phạm Ngọc Phương Linh (T • C • CA • L • B) 10:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, twinkle put the notice here for whatever reason. Will take another look. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Rename question
[edit]Hello, I have a question regarding this edit. This user is listed as having a conflict of interest for two articles and renaming the account makes it difficult to be transparent about the edits that are made. lullabying (talk) 04:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Lullabying Where can I see that? Since the account is not blocked so I do not see problems on renaming. Phạm Ngọc Phương Linh (T • C • CA • L • B) 05:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, just checked the contribs. Phạm Ngọc Phương Linh (T • C • CA • L • B) 05:02, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi Naraka1010 (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Hi Sorry for the random message. I was recently blocked on ViWiki — I think it might’ve been a mistake, maybe because of a proxy or IP issue. Just before that, I made an edit to the article on Hoàng Kiều, but after looking at it again, I realized it wasn’t entirely correct. I got blocked before I could fix it myself. If you're able to, would you mind reverting that edit for me? I’d be super grateful.
Thanks a lot, and sorry again for the hassle! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naraka1010 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)