User talk:Tsawzhak

October 2022

Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chakma people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wesoree (Talk) 15:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Chittagong Hill Tracts, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chittagong Hill Tracts, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chakma people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a minor edit

Hi Tsawzhak! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Bandarban District that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tsawzhak/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tsawzhak! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chakma people, you may be blocked from editing. DO not remove the sourced content. And do not add unsourced content. Append new information in a separate paragraph using reliable scholarly WP:RS sources. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Tsawzhak! Your additions to Chakma people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arunachal Pradesh Chakma Students' Union (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arunachal Pradesh Chakma Students' Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Tsawzhak/sandbox

Hello, Tsawzhak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Tsawzhak/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Tsawzhak/sandbox

Hello, Tsawzhak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakma Culture (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chakma Culture and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arunachal Pradesh Chakma Students' Union

Hello, Tsawzhak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Arunachal Pradesh Chakma Students' Union".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chakma Culture

Hello, Tsawzhak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chakma Culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Your edit to Chakma phonology has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Diannaa (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chakma language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanchangya. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Chakma people

This is your last warning. Please stop removing content and sections from the Chakma people. If you have a valid reason for doing so, kindly provide reliable sources and a clear explanation. Imwin567 (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Not minor edits

Hi Tsawzhak! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Chakma language and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chakma Autonomous District Council, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages INC, MNF and ZPM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of people of Chakma descent. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom of Chakma has been accepted

Kingdom of Chakma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Sohom Datta. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sohom (talk) 15:15, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakma culture

Hello Tsawzhak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chakma culture for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:12, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakma mythology

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chakma mythology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.folklore.earth/culture/chakma/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MCE89 (talk) 12:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hi Tsawzhak. It appears that your latest articles are all copied from this source: https://www.srku.edu.in Can you confirm that this content is released under a license compatible with Wikipedia or that you are authorized to release it on Wikipedia? Best, Pichpich (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Research conduct

In your new article Chakma Kingdom you have repeatedly cited these two books:

Chakma, B. (2010). Buddhism and Ethnic Conflict in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. Routledge. pp. 32–34, 45–48. ISBN 9780415486164. The Chakma kingdom was deeply rooted in Theravāda Buddhism, with its rulers patronizing monastic institutions and integrating Buddhist principles into governance." (p. 33) "Despite Mughal advances into Bengal, the Chakma Raja managed to maintain independence through military resistance and diplomacy {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
Uddin, S. (2019). The Chittagong Hill Tracts: Living with a Dilemma. Routledge. pp. 75–77, 81. ISBN 9780367279924. At the time of the 1947 partition, the Chakma leadership initially sought to remain independent or join India. However, the British administration decided to integrate the Chittagong Hill Tracts into East Pakistan." (p. 76) "The British-Chakma conflict was resolved only when Raja Jan Baksh Khan agreed to pay revenue in exchange for semi-autonomy. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)

Can you explain:

Why are the ISBNs invalid?
Why does the supposed publisher, Routledge, have no record of the titles?
Why do no WorldCat libraries hold these titles?
Why does Google Scholar show that no one has ever cited these works?
Why does Google return no search matches for the quotes you provided?

Did you consult these sources yourself, or did you see them cited elsewhere? Can you supply any evidence that they are not falsified or fabricated? --Worldbruce (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why do all six of your citations of: van Schendel, Willem (2000). The Chittagong Hill Tracts: Living in a Borderland. University of Washington Press [sic]. pp. 52–60, 89–93. 95. fail verification? --Worldbruce (talk) 02:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all articles into one

There is no such need to create separate articles for topics like music, culture, traditional games, or ethnic religion for an ethnic minority group. Instead, these can be "merged" within the main article/page for the Chakma people. Additionally, please avoid using AI to generate entire articles. It’s fine to use AI tools for rephrasing or improving existing content, but the article itself should not be entirely AI-generated. Imwin567 (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Continued copyright violations

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:47, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tsawzhak (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In case any unblocks are considered, note that many/most of the articles created by this account are filled with AI fabricated texts/hoaxes. Sohom (talk) 02:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chakma martial arts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chakma martial arts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakma martial arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-Chakma Wars moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anglo-Chakma Wars. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chakma Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chakma Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakma Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zeibgeist (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chakma history moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chakma history. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and several sources appear to be hallucinated or fabricated. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Tsawzhak. Thank you for your work on Lurism. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BLAR notice

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Chakma phonology, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Chakma language#Phonology. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tsawzhak. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Lurism

Hello, Tsawzhak

I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Lurism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 11 § Lurism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:26, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Culture of Chakmas

Hello, Tsawzhak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Culture of Chakmas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]