Jump to content

User talk:DreamRimmer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:DreamRimmer Alt)

This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.


Thank you for helping with this project. Can you please update the progress for the past two days? We're still cleaning up sourced articles that are mislabeled. Bearian (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DreamRimmer bot II

[edit]

Hello, DreamRimmer,

The bot didn't make it's regularly scheduled User:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts report at 04:26 UTC that it typically makes every hour. This is not that unusual but since I see you are editing, I thought I'd mention it in case it meant you needed to check it out. It usually reports even when there is nothing to report but just a blank report! I hope you are well and having a good summer. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting. I see it issued the report a few minutes ago. – DreamRimmer 04:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that premature warning. I usually wait until a bot has missed 2 or 3 reports before contacting the bot operator but I saw you were editing so I came here. Looks like everything is okay! Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 05:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Please feel free to message anytime you see any issue with the bot or its report. It runs at the 22nd minute of every hour and usually takes 3 to 4 minutes to send notifications, tag pages, and update the final report. It can sometimes take longer, around 10 to 15 minutes, if there are many drafts to tag and notify. At times, its job gets stuck on Toolforge, so it may miss a few reports. – DreamRimmer 06:03, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello, DreamRimmer,
Sorry to keep bothering you about this but sometimes, like tonight, this bot just skips issuing reports. And this is a bot that issues a report even when there are no pages to report. Is it stuck on Toolforge? I have another issue with a different Toolforge link that maybe you can assist me with after this gets resolved. Thanks, in advance. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could you check on this? It hasn't run in over 12 hours. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was our CSD G13 list today. We had 393 expiring drafts and we typically have around 150 per day. It would have been a great day to have your tool working so that each draft didn't have to be individually and manually tagged. I hope you can get to this soon. We won't have another day with this many expiring drafts but your tool just helps us move quicker through them. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 20:58, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay. I have restarted it. Please let me know if I can help with anything else. – DreamRimmer 03:10, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, DreamRimmer! I could have really used it earlier today but better now than never!
I had another problem I was wondering whether you could help on. There is an Empty Categories link at Toolforge (see here) that Legoktm set up. It allows us to click the link and it does a search for empty categories in the system. The alternative is a database report (Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories) but that only comes out once a day rather than asking it to search whenever I want to know what empty categories there are. Well, if you click on the Toolforge link now, it runs and runs and doesn't complete the process. I get a message that says "500 Internal Server Error Input/output error: Input/output error: connection closed". Try it and you will see.
And so I've been trying to contact Legoktm, on his user talk page, through email and after a week, he responded but said he can't get to it until the end of July! See our discussion at User talk:Legoktm#Toolforge Empty Categories link. Any way, if you look at the discussion, you can see that his latest suggestion is to find someone else to remake this tool. I have no idea how hard this would be. It seems easier to fix his tool but I'm not sure how folks feel about other editors working on their editing tools. Could you check this out and see what you think? Since I can't expect his fix until the end of July, anything sooner would be a God's send. Thanks for considering this request. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can make a tool for this, but since Legoktm already has one and plans to fix it, it would not be worth making a new one. You can use this SQL query in the meantime. – DreamRimmer 12:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail Suggestion

[edit]
Hello, DreamRimmer. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. OPHYRIUS 11:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Administrator changes

removed NuclearWarfare

Interface administrator changes

added L235

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous

  • The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
  • Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!

Tech News: 2025-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • July 9–15 - Call for candidates
  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DR. Thanks for your work in giving out barnstars for the backlog drive (and giving me this amazing username). I just realized I didn't get a level badge for finishing above 750 points. Wondering if you'd forgotten or if it's a new rule. Frost 10:27, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost: My mistake. I completely forgot about it. Thank you for reminding. – DreamRimmer 11:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • uly 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.

July thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in July! - Three Ukrainian topics were on the main page today, at least at the beginning, RD and DYK, - see my talk. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]