User talk:Cabayi
|
How can I find out if Nonie Darwish is covered in any way by ARBPIA?
[edit]I guess I could make a clarification request, but that seems a bit overkill. Than ks. Doug Weller talk 10:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Doug, as a personal opinion I would say that a person described as "founder of the Arabs for Israel movement" in the first sentence of their biography falls squarely under the scope of ARBPIA. Usual disclaimer, I am but one voice among fifteen members of the committee, etc. As Template:Editnotices/Page/Nonie Darwish has not been created so nobody has specifically given notice that it is in scope.
- I see the {{BLP editnotice}} has crowded out or suppressed in some way the Page notice link to ease creation of Template:Editnotices/Page/Nonie Darwish. Pinging Sdkb as the last editor of the BLP editnotice template. Cabayi (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm not familiar with why the BLP editnotice replaces the link to create a page notice. Does that behaviour extend to all existing editnotices? Sdkb talk 14:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sdkb, Kjersti Flaa which has no other editnotices has this problem. Donald Trump which has other editnotices and BLP does not have this problem. Yasser Arafat which has other editnotices and does not have BLP does not have this problem. Winston Churchill which has no editnotices does not have this problem. It seems to be that the presence of the BLP editnotice somehow suppresses the possibility of adding page notices. Cabayi (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm not sure why that's happening. I sent an invite to WP:VPT to see if someone else knows. Sdkb talk 18:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sdkb, Kjersti Flaa which has no other editnotices has this problem. Donald Trump which has other editnotices and BLP does not have this problem. Yasser Arafat which has other editnotices and does not have BLP does not have this problem. Winston Churchill which has no editnotices does not have this problem. It seems to be that the presence of the BLP editnotice somehow suppresses the possibility of adding page notices. Cabayi (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm not familiar with why the BLP editnotice replaces the link to create a page notice. Does that behaviour extend to all existing editnotices? Sdkb talk 14:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Thanks everyone. Doug Weller talk 19:19, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Yuck
[edit]That was a deeply, deeply unimpressive comment you left at Tamzin's CU feedback page. I expect more from a current Arb, and it makes me wish you were not one. Long ago, I resigned from ArbCom when (among other reasons) I realized I took criticism of my behavior as an Arb too personally. Please consider doing the same. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing your opinion, much as I did. I stand by my reading of Tamzin's opinions. Because they involved me I recused from engagement in the process as an Arb, I do not recuse from having and expressing opinions as a Wikipedian.
- I guess you'll be overjoyed to know that I've already decided that two terms and four years of working out of my inbox rather than my watchlist will be enough, and that I won't be standing in WP:ACE2025. Cabayi (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- The "I'm recused as an Arb but I oppose and by the way everyone remember I'm an Arb" game disgusts me. I also note that the takeaway from all this for future CU volunteers is that people who criticize Arbs need not apply. That's very Trumpian of you, so kudos on understanding how the world works now. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- "people who criticize Arbs need not apply", if that were so I'd have kept my mouth shut and just voted to oppose. YMMV Cabayi (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- That response is a non sequitur, though I suspect you think it was clever. Yuck again. Goodbye. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- "people who criticize Arbs need not apply", if that were so I'd have kept my mouth shut and just voted to oppose. YMMV Cabayi (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- The "I'm recused as an Arb but I oppose and by the way everyone remember I'm an Arb" game disgusts me. I also note that the takeaway from all this for future CU volunteers is that people who criticize Arbs need not apply. That's very Trumpian of you, so kudos on understanding how the world works now. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Your email
[edit]The Limited liability company legal status is not incompatible with sole proprietorship. I see no evidence that this is anything other than a one person venture. Of course, other admistrators may disagree with me. I suggest taking the matter to the Conflict of interest noticeboard instead. Cullen328 (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Jamjarcars for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamjarcars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
You've got mail
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. - RichT|C|E-Mail 11:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Rich Smith, answer sent. Cabayi (talk) 11:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)