Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 100-metre butterfly/GA1

GA review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 16:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 03:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I will take on this review. -Riley1012 (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! IAWW (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I completely forgot I had opened this. I will have a review up later today. -Riley1012 (talk) 10:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

Per MOS:US, the use of the USA should be changed to the US/the U.S. or the United States.
In the semifinals, Walsh set a new Olympic record, but in the finals Huske won by 0.04 seconds... Add a comma after "finals"
Walsh finished second and Yufei finished third. Add a comma after "second"
The swimmers with the best 8 times in the semifinals advanced to the final. Spell out "eight" per MOS:NUMERAL
Roos Vanotterdijk broke the Belgian national record, by swimming 57.25 seconds. Remove the comma after "record"
...while David Rieder of Swimming World said "it was a result three years in the making." Put the period outside of quotation marks (for consistency with the rest of the article)

2. Verifiable
The sources used are reliable. Passes Earwig's. Spot check: 1, 2, 8, 14, 19, 20 - All good.

3. Broad
The article covers the main aspects of the event without going into unnecessary detail

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
The talk page and the edit history indicate that this article is stable.

6. Illustrated
The one image used is tagged with its license, is relevant, and has a suitable caption

@It is a wonderful world: Okay, that is all I have! -Riley1012 (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012 Thank you again for taking this on. I made all the changes you suggested, except I think the full stop should go inside the quotation on the last point, per MOS:LQ. IAWW (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the changes look good. I will pass this. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.