Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100-metre butterfly

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100-metre butterfly has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 26, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swimming

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100-metre butterfly is part of the "Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics" series, a current good topic candidate. A good topic should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

GA review

Passed. Arconning (talk) 12:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metre butterfly/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 22:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 07:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shall review. Arconning (talk) 07:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thx :3 IAWW (talk) 08:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@It is a wonderful world My comments. Arconning (talk) 15:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Arconning, most are responded to, but I had some queries. IAWW (talk) 10:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

"Paris La Défense Arena, which was converted to a swimming pool for the swimming events." this statement could be said in the background so the lead doesn't have to use a source.

Done, I need to do this on all the articles at some point

Definitely include how it was an anticipated race.

Done

Background

No issues, see second comment for lead.

Qualification

No issues.

Heats

Include an "NR" for Ssengonzi's note section.

Done

Missing accent marks and such: Clement Secchi, Daniel Gracik, Nikola Miljenic, Milos Milenkovic.

Ah I thought I fixed all these by fixing the green links but that didn't fully work. That is a big pain. How did you know "Daniel Gracik" and "Nikola Miljenic" have accents, and where are the accents? IAWW (talk) 10:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@It is a wonderful world Daniel Gracík and Miloš Milenković, a quick Google search would confirm their accents on my part Arconning (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Athletes from 38th to 40th place could have shortened names.

Done

Semifinals

See second comment in "Heats"

Done

Finals

"fast open turn and underwater" ?

I linked "open turn" and "underwater" here. Do you think that is enough? IAWW (talk) 10:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, underwater is a technical term, gotcha! Arconning (talk) 12:45, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"His finishing touch wasn't as well timed ", a bit informal. Make more formal to maintain encyclopedic tone.

Changed to "He didn't finish as close to the optimum period in the butterfly stroke as Milák did". I'm really struggling to balance accessibility with formality here. What do you think? IAWW (talk) 10:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Media

Image used has appropriate licensing and is relevant to the article.

Refs

Earwig seems alright.
Ref check: 1, 2, 6, 12, 16, 25. All good.

Misc

No ongoing edit war, neutral and focused information.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.