Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100-metre breaststroke

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100-metre breaststroke has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 7, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Olympics

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Swimming

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100-metre breaststroke is part of the "Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics" series, a current good topic candidate. A good topic should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

GA review

Passed. Arconning (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metre breaststroke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 12:46, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 06:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will review in a few, article seems interesting. Arconning (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@It is a wonderful world Here are my comments! Arconning (talk) 12:36, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Arconning, thanks again for another in depth review. I made all the changes you suggested. IAWW (talk) 20:42, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

"and shortly after that he stepped back from swimming,", stepped back is quite informal. This could probably replaced with "he announced his break from competitive swimming."

Both quotes in the lead would require sourcing.

Background

"The event was held at Paris La Défense Arena, which was converted to a swimming pool for the swimming events.[4]", this statement could be moved to the start of the Heats section.

Qualification

No issues.

Heats

Chadd Ning's name could be shortened.

I feel like Dutchman would be a bit too informal.

Semifinals

No issues.

Finals

"since the to six swimmers finished within 0.29 seconds", omit "to" and add "of each other"

See lead comment regarding Peaty's quote.

Media

Image used has proper licensing and is relevant to the article. All good.

Refs

Earwig's alright.
Ref checks: 1, 7, 15, 17, 23. All good.

Misc

No ongoing edit war, broad enough information, neutral.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

MOS-compliant lead: trivial race details removed for clarity and relevance

Previously the lede mentioned there were two laps to finish a 100m race and pool is 50m long. I trimmed that filler so to condense the lead in line with MOS:LEDE to highlight notable content. See prior comments already resolving same issue: Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 100 metre freestyle#top. Also further explanation here: User:IP49XX/Why MOS Matters. IP49XX (talk) 01:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]