Jump to content

Talk:Cloverdale Depot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Cloverdale station)

Legally Required?

[edit]

Added the citation tag for the History section due to the precise wording contained in the second paragraph. It seems odd that the station should be specifically mentioned as "legally required" to be the north terminus. A source should be added to provide further context as to the necessity of this precise wording. BT14 (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 March 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 15:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Cloverdale stationCloverdale Depot – Nearly all sources report the name to be Clvoerdale Depot or simply the Depot. WP:USSTATIONS even makes note that this sort of naming is preferred to forced assignment of the word "station". MJ (talk) 03:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I note the previous move

07:41, 20 August 2018 Pi.1415926535 talk contribs block  49 bytes +49  Pi.1415926535 moved page Cloverdale Depot to Cloverdale station: per USSTATION

so pinging Pi.1415926535 (who is currently active) for their detailed reasoning. Andrewa (talk) 20:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a strong opinion either way. When I moved it in 2018, "Cloverdale Depot" didn't seem to be consistently used, but that may have changed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.