This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm all for calling out white supremacy signals I do think it's interesting information, but it seems incredibly biased for Wikipedia in addition to being largely unverifiable - neither of the references in this section confirm a connection between the two, and is most certainly information that would NEED a reference (especially since that is what the entire section is about).
The user who created this page and added the text also has a history of bad faith edits and edits of questionable biases. Regardless of where the sentiment behind these edits come from, they have no place on Wikipedia without informed, high-quality sources. Bipolarcomposer (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
if a credible source alleging the connection arises, i think the section is worth having, but until then i agree that it shouldnt be included. GameCreepr (talk) 07:46, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concerns about sourcing, but allegations of the connection are all over social media. It's easy to see what this is, and it seems like there ought to be some way of acknowledging that so many people see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F140:400:F:18A5:7052:3DAA:A39B (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
People are always promoting conspiracy theories on social media; this isn't notable. Notability is demosntrated through the use of independent sources. — Czello(music)07:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe an "alleged connection" or "controversy" section could be in order, as there's plenty of evidence of people claiming the connection on social media, as to acknowledge the discourse without making judgements. 2600:1008:B13D:1BB:5072:BA70:8ED9:5EEB (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Plenty of evidence of people nattering online isn't concrete sources that Wikipedia can use, please see WP:CITE and WP:V. Nobody can deny the fact that the designation is at least similar to 14/88, but, without sources from reliable news agencies making that connection, we simply cannot add that information or anything relating to it to this page. CommissarDoggoTalk?20:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do we need a source for saying "1+1=2"?
Trump is a neo-nazi, 14/88 is a neo-nazi dogwhistle. 14/88 with the / turned into a 1 for numeric coding is blindingly obvious. And he made this the one about Jews. Where's the doubt? 81.2.120.161 (talk) 03:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the Wikipedia consensus regarding ADL claims apply to this article as well? A lot of the main body just repeats ADL claims as facts or includes articles that only cites ADL figures. The only reception being a single opinion piece that doesn't appear to be particularly notable also raises WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE issues. — jonas (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]