Talk:75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event

75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 4, 2024). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 13, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Australia: Politics / Sports Mid‑importance

	Australia portal 75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page has been marked as needing a taskforce assigned.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 10:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pharaoh496 and thanks for almost single-handedly writing this article. Unfortunately, about half the content in the body of the article is unreferenced. Examples are the paragraphs starting with "Foreign diplomatic relations between Australia and India are well-established", "PM Albanese visited India in March 2023. During the visit, he also led a trade delegation", and "In 1996, the Border-Gavaskar Trophy was created, a test series". This fails the GA criterion 2b, which states that text in the body of the article should have citations no later than the end of the paragraph. This should be addressed before a renomination. A few other observations:

Ideally, the first sentence should start with a definition, see MOS:LEADSENTENCE. It could start with "75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event was an event..." or something similar.
Why does every single picture have Modi and Albanese in it? More variety would be better.
In first innings Usman Khawaja and add "the" before "first" and add a comma after "innings"
In the first innings, Shubman Gill and a little repetitive since the sentence before the previous sentence starts the same way
respectively, In result Australia the comma should probably be a period

Phlsph7 (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pharaoh496 (talk · contribs) 19:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 15:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are appropriately tagged. What makes the following reliable sources?

moneycontrol.com -- I can't find an "About" page that would give me information about the site.
inshorts.com -- ditto.

I'll do spotchecks next, probably later today. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spotchecks. Footnote numbers refer to this version.

FN 37 cites "Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill opened India's account, adding 74 runs for the first wicket. After scoring his twenty-first run, Sharma became the sixth Indian to cross 17,000 runs in international cricket." Does not mention Gill or the first wicket partnership score.
FN 35 cites "... with Khawaja being dismissed short of a double hundred. As Green departed for 114, A late order partnership between Nathan Lyon and Todd Murphy saw Australia set a commanding total for 480 ...". I listened to this and I don't think Khawaja is mentioned, nor Green.
FN 36 cites "... with Ashwin taking the wickets of the remainder of the batters, bringing up his thirty-second five wicket haul in international cricket. He became not only the highest wicket taker for India in games against Australia, but also the highest wicket taker in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy ..." The source has "He also surpassed India legend Anil Kumble and became the bowler with the most 5-wicket haul in India with 26."
FN 43 cites "This was the second time that both of them had won this award. After the match, Kohli presented his signed jerseys to Khawaja and Carey as a symbol of friendship" The first part of this is not in the given source.

As the first four spotchecks all failed, I am going to stop here and fail this nomination. If/when you fix these and renominate, please note that there are some uncited sentences in the article that will need to be cited before it can pass GA -- some of the bullets under "Match summary", for example, and most of the paragraph starting "After the gallery visit", and some of the list in the "Attendance" section. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 March 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Fourth Test, 2022–23 Border–Gavaskar Trophy. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 7 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event → Fourth Test, 2022–23 Border–Gavaskar Trophy – Standard naming convention for test matches, see Category:Test cricket matches. Vestrian24Bio 03:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 07:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Agletarang (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Comment The standard naming convention is for iconic matches where records were tumbled. This was a partnership sort of match played under this banner and logo. Convention will not hold here. Pharaoh496 (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Pharaoh496: that's not how naming conventions work on Wikipedia; read WP:NC. Vestrian24Bio 13:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If I can have more direction, which specific part of this guideline are you referring to? Pharaoh496 (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CONSISTENT, WP:TITLECON - titles for the same kind of subject should not differ in form or structure without good reason. Where multiple titles are available, and where titles are equally usable in terms of recognizability, naturalness, preciseness, and conciseness, then the title to be used should be consistent with titles used for similar or related topics in Wikipedia Vestrian24Bio 02:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Same kind of subject - all other match titles have an exclusive focus on the match. this one does not. this needs to be more thought over. Pharaoh496 (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Noticeboard for India-related topics, WikiProject Australian politics, alian Wikipedians' notice board, WikiProject Cricket, and WikiProject Australian sports have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 07:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency with the others in the same tournament. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - as a cricket match this is no more or less notable than any other Test match - CricInfo called it "a tedious draw" in its report (source). It's only special notability comes about as a result of the political events surrounding it, so that, or something like it, should be the name of the article. Without that, this is a strong delete at AfD for me - otherwise we're essentially saying that every modern Test match featuring India is notable (there'd probably be a case that could be made for that argument if anyone would care to try it). I can't, then, see how we should list this under the name of the match as we would we an actually notable-enough Test match. I'd argue that a lot of the match detail should also be removed from the article fwiw - this is a political event and most of the cricket coverage is really routine - someone caught someone off someone's bolding and someone scored some runs. I'm with CricInfo here Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Blue Square Thing — Amakuru (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.