Talk:Cradle (company)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 25 July 2025 by reviewer Qcne (talk · contribs).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Thepranxter (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

Review

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hello! I am connected to the subject of this draft and therefore am not resubmitting it myself to avoid COI. However, I believe the article meets notability, sourcing, and neutrality requirements. Could an uninvolved editor please review and, if appropriate, submit this draft to Articles for Creation? Thank you very much for your consideration. Thepranxter (talk) 07:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Thepranxter, I've submitted the draft to AfC, they'll do their own review and get back to you soon. Thanks, Encoded Talk 💬 09:20, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COI disclosure and request for new AfC review

Thank you for mentioning notability and flagging edit suggestions.

I am affiliated with Cradle (COI disclosed). After the decline I rewrote the draft to remove promotional tone: converted the bullet timeline to prose, trimmed awards/partnerships lacking independent coverage, added a neutral Technology section, reduced “Recognition” to independently sourced lists (Wired, Bloomberg, Forbes), and ensured each paragraph has at least one independent citation.

Requesting a fresh AfC review. Thanks. Thepranxter (talk) 09:33, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comment: Two of those links don't work for me and none of them lead to in depth independent coverage as is required for an article. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The company seems notable enough, however the article is promotional. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 06:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]