1937 Bengal Legislative Assembly election

1937 Bengal Legislative Assembly election
All 250 seats in the Bengal Legislative Assembly; 125 seats needed for a majority
	Elected Prime Minister ; A. K. Fazlul Huq; KPP

The 1937 Bengal Legislative Assembly election was held in January 1937 as part of the broader 1937 Indian provincial elections introduced under the Government of India Act 1935. It marked the establishment of the Bengal Legislative Assembly with expanded powers and provincial autonomy. The election resulted in a hung assembly, with the Krishak Praja Party, led by A. K. Fazlul Huq, forming a coalition government.

Background

The Government of India Act 1935 introduced significant constitutional reforms, aiming to grant greater self-governance to Indians under British colonial rule. Among its most notable provisions was the establishment of provincial autonomy, replacing the dyarchy introduced by the 1919 Act. Under the 1935 Act, Indian ministers were given full control over provincial portfolios, with the exception of defense, external affairs, and certain matters related to the Governor’s discretionary powers.^[1]

In the Province of Bengal, the Act established a bicameral legislature, comprising the Legislative Assembly (lower house) and the Legislative Council (upper house). The Legislative Assembly consisted of 250 members, elected through a system of separate electorates that reflected the communal and socio-economic divisions in colonial Bengal. The electorate was limited and based largely on property, income, and education qualifications, which disproportionately favored landowners, urban elites, and business interests.^[2]

The 250 seats in the Bengal Legislative Assembly were categorized into various communal and functional constituencies. These included seats reserved for Muslims, Hindus, Scheduled Castes (Depressed Classes), Europeans, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, landlords, commerce and industry, and universities. Of these, 117 seats were reserved for Muslims, 78 for Hindus, and 30 for Scheduled Castes, while the remaining were distributed among other interest-based categories.^[2]

The Act allowed Indian ministers to form cabinets and manage internal provincial affairs, provided they commanded the confidence of the majority in the Assembly. However, the Governor retained overriding authority in certain matters, including the power to dismiss ministries and veto legislation. This tension between Indian autonomy and colonial control remained a key political issue throughout the tenure of the provincial governments formed under the 1935 Act.^[3]

Seats

The allocation of 250 seats in the assembly was based on the communal award. It is illustrated in the following.^[4]

General elected seats- 78
Muslim electorate seats- 117
- Urban seats- 6
- Rural seats- 111
Anglo-Indian electorate seats- 3
European electorate seats- 11
Indian Christian electorate seats- 2
Zamindar seats- 5
Labour representatives- 8
Education seats- 2
- University of Calcutta- 1
- University of Dacca- 1
Women seats- 5
- General electorate- 2
- Muslim electorate- 2
- Anglo-Indian electorate- 1
Commerce, Industries and Planting seats- 19
- Port of Calcutta
- Port of Chittagong
- Bengal Chamber of Commerce
- Jute Interest
- Tea Interest
- Railways
- Traders Associations
- Others

Results

The Indian National Congress emerged as the largest party overall with 52 seats, but it fell far short of a majority. The Krishak Praja Party (KPP) and Muslim League, both primarily Muslim-based parties, gained significant influence in the Muslim-majority constituencies. The Muslim League notably gained strength in urban Muslim areas, while the KPP, representing rural Muslim peasants, had success in rural constituencies. Despite the League winning fewer total seats than Congress, it secured a stronger presence in the reserved Muslim seats due to communal electorate divisions.^[5]


Party		Seats
	INC	54
	AIML	40
	KPP	35
	CPI	32
	Tripura Krishak Party	5
	CNP	3
	ABHM	2
	Independent Muslims	42
	Independent Hindus	37
Total		250

Aftermath

Government Formation

Following the 1937 elections, no single party secured an outright majority in the 250-member Bengal Legislative Assembly. The Indian National Congress, although the largest single party with 52 seats, chose not to form a government in Bengal, partly due to its national policy of avoiding coalition governments in provinces where it lacked a clear majority.^[6]

Instead, A.K. Fazlul Huq, leader of the Krishak Praja Party (KPP), succeeded in forming a coalition ministry. The KPP had won 36 seats, mostly in rural Muslim constituencies. To secure a working majority, Huq entered into an alliance with the All-India Muslim League, which had won 39 seats, particularly from urban Muslim areas and elite Muslim voters. The coalition also included support from independent Muslim legislators, some Scheduled Caste leaders, and Hindu Mahasabha members. On April 1, 1937, Fazlul Huq was sworn in as the first Prime Minister of Bengal, under the provisions of the Government of India Act 1935^[2]^[3]

Coalition Tensions

Despite initially cooperating with the Muslim League, Huq maintained a degree of independence from its central leadership, which led to increasing tension.^[7] Huq prioritized regional and economic issues over communal ones, advocating land reforms and peasant welfare, often in opposition to the elite Muslim landlords who supported the League.^[2]

By 1941, the tensions had grown severe, and Huq broke away from the Muslim League. He later joined hands with the Hindu Mahasabha in a controversial move that further alienated both Muslim and Hindu hardliners.^[8]

Dismissal of the Government

The collapse of trust among coalition partners, widespread food shortages, inflation caused by World War II, and mounting communal tensions gradually eroded the legitimacy of Huq’s government. In March 1943, the Governor of Bengal, exercising his authority under the Government of India Act 1935, dismissed Huq’s ministry on grounds of political instability and loss of Assembly support. Huq’s dismissal marked the end of Bengal’s first elected provincial government.^[9]

References

^ Coupland, Sir Reginald (1944). The Indian Problem: Report on the Constitutional Problem in India. Oxford University Press.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Chatterji, Joya (1994). Bengal Divided: Hindu Communalism and Partition, 1932–1947. Cambridge South Asian Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563256. ISBN 978-0-521-52328-8.
^ ^a ^b Sarkar, Sumit (1992). Modern India, 1885 - 1947. Cambridge Commonwealth series (Reprint. [der 2. ed. 1989] ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-43806-0.
^ Sirajul Islam (2012). "Bengal Legislative Assembly". In Islam, Sirajul; Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
^ Ali, Tariq Omar (2018-05-15), "6. Peasant Populism", A Local History of Global Capital, Princeton University Press, pp. 137–167, doi:10.23943/9781400889280-009, ISBN 978-1-4008-8928-0, retrieved 2025-07-03
^ Jalal, Ayesha (1985). The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge South Asian Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558856. ISBN 978-0-521-45850-4.
^ Jalal, Ayesha (2005). Self and sovereignty: individual and community in South Asian Islam since 1850 (Digital print ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-22078-1.
^ Datta, Kalikinkar (1957). History of the Freedom Movement in Bihar, Volume 2. Bihar, India: Government of Bihar.
^ Sisson, Richard; Wolpert, Stanley, eds. (2024-05-29). Congress and Indian Nationalism. University of California Press. doi:10.1525/9780520377370. ISBN 978-0-520-37737-0.

Further sources

Jahanara Begum: The Bengal Legislature of 1937 and Its Characteristics. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Vol. 36 (1975), pp. 485–492 (online version at JSTOR)
David Denis Taylor: Indian Politics and the Elections of 1937. D.Phil. thesis, University of London 1971. ProQuest Number: 11010433 (online version)
Shila Sen: Muslim Politics in Bengal 1937-47. Impex India: New Delhi, 1976 (online summary)

[1] Coupland, Sir Reginald (1944). The Indian Problem: Report on the Constitutional Problem in India. Oxford University Press.

[:0-2] Chatterji, Joya (1994). Bengal Divided: Hindu Communalism and Partition, 1932–1947. Cambridge South Asian Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563256. ISBN 978-0-521-52328-8.

[:1-3] Sarkar, Sumit (1992). Modern India, 1885 - 1947. Cambridge Commonwealth series (Reprint. [der 2. ed. 1989] ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-43806-0.

[banglapedia1-4] Sirajul Islam (2012). "Bengal Legislative Assembly". In Islam, Sirajul; Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.

[5] Ali, Tariq Omar (2018-05-15), "6. Peasant Populism", A Local History of Global Capital, Princeton University Press, pp. 137–167, doi:10.23943/9781400889280-009, ISBN 978-1-4008-8928-0, retrieved 2025-07-03

[6] Jalal, Ayesha (1985). The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge South Asian Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558856. ISBN 978-0-521-45850-4.

[7] Jalal, Ayesha (2005). Self and sovereignty: individual and community in South Asian Islam since 1850 (Digital print ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-22078-1.

[8] Datta, Kalikinkar (1957). History of the Freedom Movement in Bihar, Volume 2. Bihar, India: Government of Bihar.

[9] Sisson, Richard; Wolpert, Stanley, eds. (2024-05-29). Congress and Indian Nationalism. University of California Press. doi:10.1525/9780520377370. ISBN 978-0-520-37737-0.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]